Hanna Stephanie J, Powell Wendy E, Long Anna E, Robinson Emma J S, Davies Joanne, Megson Clare, Howell Alexandra, Jones Taz J, Ladell Kristin, Price David A, Dayan Colin M, Williams Alistair J K, Gillespie Kathleen M, Wong F Susan
Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Diabetes and Metabolism, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Diabetologia. 2020 Jun;63(6):1174-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05114-7. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to characterise islet autoantibody profiles and immune cell phenotypes in slow progressors to type 1 diabetes.
Immunological variables were compared across peripheral blood samples obtained from slow progressors to type 1 diabetes, individuals with newly diagnosed or long-standing type 1 diabetes, and healthy individuals. Polychromatic flow cytometry was used to characterise the phenotypic attributes of B and T cells. Islet autoantigen-specific B cells were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay and islet autoantigen-specific CD8 T cells were quantified using peptide-HLA class I tetramers. Radioimmunoassays were used to detect islet autoantibodies. Sera were assayed for various chemokines, cytokines and soluble receptors via ELISAs.
Islet autoantibodies were lost over time in slow progressors. Various B cell subsets expressed higher levels of CD95 in slow progressors, especially after polyclonal stimulation, compared with the corresponding B cell subsets in healthy donors (p < 0.05). The phenotypic characteristics of CD4 and CD8 T cells were similar in slow progressors and healthy donors. Lower frequencies of CD4 T cells with a central memory phenotype (CD27, CD127, CD95) were observed in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (mean percentage of total CD4 T cells was 3.00% in slow progressors vs 4.67% in healthy donors, p < 0.05). Autoreactive B cell responses to proinsulin were detected at higher frequencies in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (median no. of spots was 0 in healthy donors vs 24.34 in slow progressors, p < 0.05) in an ELISpot assay. Islet autoantigen-specific CD8 T cell responses were largely absent in slow progressors and healthy donors. Serum levels of DcR3, the decoy receptor for CD95L, were elevated in slow progressors compared with healthy donors (median was 1087 pg/ml in slow progressors vs 651 pg/ml in healthy donors, p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In this study, we found that slow progression to type 1 diabetes was associated with a loss of islet autoantibodies and a distinct B cell phenotype, consistent with enhanced apoptotic regulation of peripheral autoreactivity via CD95. These phenotypic changes warrant further studies in larger cohorts to determine their functional implications.
目的/假设:本研究旨在描述1型糖尿病缓慢进展者的胰岛自身抗体谱和免疫细胞表型。
比较从1型糖尿病缓慢进展者、新诊断或长期患1型糖尿病的个体以及健康个体获取的外周血样本中的免疫变量。采用多色流式细胞术来描述B细胞和T细胞的表型特征。使用酶联免疫斑点(ELISpot)测定法对胰岛自身抗原特异性B细胞进行定量,使用肽-HLA I类四聚体对胰岛自身抗原特异性CD8 T细胞进行定量。采用放射免疫测定法检测胰岛自身抗体。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测血清中的各种趋化因子、细胞因子和可溶性受体。
在缓慢进展者中,胰岛自身抗体随时间逐渐消失。与健康供体中的相应B细胞亚群相比,在缓慢进展者中,各种B细胞亚群表达更高水平的CD95,尤其是在多克隆刺激后(p<0.05)。缓慢进展者和健康供体中CD4和CD8 T细胞的表型特征相似。与健康供体相比,在缓慢进展者中观察到具有中央记忆表型(CD27、CD127、CD95)的CD4 T细胞频率较低(缓慢进展者中CD4 T细胞总数的平均百分比为3.00%,健康供体中为4.67%,p<0.05)。在ELISpot测定中,与健康供体相比,在缓慢进展者中检测到对胰岛素原的自身反应性B细胞反应频率更高(健康供体中斑点数中位数为0,缓慢进展者中为24.34,p<0.05)。在缓慢进展者和健康供体中,胰岛自身抗原特异性CD8 T细胞反应基本不存在。与健康供体相比,缓慢进展者中CD95L的诱饵受体DcR3的血清水平升高(缓慢进展者中位数为1087 pg/ml,健康供体中为651 pg/ml,p=0.06)。
结论/解读:在本研究中,我们发现1型糖尿病的缓慢进展与胰岛自身抗体的丧失和独特的B细胞表型有关,这与通过CD95增强外周自身反应性的凋亡调节一致。这些表型变化值得在更大的队列中进一步研究,以确定它们的功能意义。