Division of Radiology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, 2nd Floor, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil.
Post-Graduation Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3934-3942. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06723-x. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is part of clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC).
The MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies using ADC to evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with EC. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the QUADAS tool. Data from eligible studies were extracted and evaluated by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed comparing mean ADC values between responders and non-responders to nCRT in three different scenarios: baseline (BL) absolute values; percent change between intermediate (IM) values and BL; and percent change between final follow-up (FU) value and baseline BL.
Seven studies (n = 158 patients) were included. Responders exhibited a statistically significant percent increase in ADC during nCRT (mean difference [MD] 21.06%, 95%CI = 13.04-29.09; I = 49%; p = 0.12). A similar increase was identified in the complete pathologic response (pCR) versus non-complete pathologic response (npCR) subgroup (MD = 25.68%, 95%CI = 18.87-32.48; I = 0%; p = 0.60). At the end of treatment, responders also exhibited a statistically significant percent increase in ADC (MD = 22.49%, 95%CI = 9.94-35.05; I = 0%; p = 0.46). BL ADC was not associated with any definition of pathologic response (MD = 0.11%, 95%CI = - 0.21-0.42; I = 85%; p < 0.01).
These results suggest that ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR. ADC may serve as a tool to help in guiding clinical decisions.
• DWI is routinely included in MRI oncological protocols. • ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR.
弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)是临床实践的一部分。本研究旨在评估表观扩散系数(ADC)作为预测食管癌(EC)患者新辅助治疗(nCRT)病理反应的指标的作用。
系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Google Scholar 数据库,以使用 ADC 评估 EC 患者新辅助治疗反应的研究。使用 QUADAS 工具评估研究的方法学质量。由两名独立评审员提取和评估合格研究的数据。在三种不同情况下,对 nCRT 反应者和无反应者的平均 ADC 值进行了荟萃分析:基线(BL)绝对值;中间(IM)值与 BL 之间的百分比变化;以及最终随访(FU)值与基线 BL 之间的百分比变化。
纳入了 7 项研究(n=158 例患者)。反应者在 nCRT 期间表现出 ADC 值的统计学显著增加(平均差异 [MD] 21.06%,95%CI=13.04-29.09;I=49%;p=0.12)。在完全病理缓解(pCR)与不完全病理缓解(npCR)亚组中也发现了类似的增加(MD=25.68%,95%CI=18.87-32.48;I=0%;p=0.60)。在治疗结束时,反应者的 ADC 值也表现出统计学显著的百分比增加(MD=22.49%,95%CI=9.94-35.05;I=0%;p=0.46)。BL ADC 与任何病理反应定义均无相关性(MD=0.11%,95%CI=-0.21-0.42;I=85%;p<0.01)。
这些结果表明,ADC 可用作病理反应的预测指标,治疗期间和治疗后 ADC 百分比增加与 pCR 之间存在统计学显著关联。ADC 可作为帮助指导临床决策的工具。
DWI 常规纳入 MRI 肿瘤学方案。
ADC 可用作预测病理反应的指标,治疗期间和治疗后 ADC 百分比增加与 pCR 之间存在统计学显著关联。