Suppr超能文献

胶质母细胞瘤的趋势:随时间和干预类型的变化的结果:一项系统的基于证据的分析。

Trends in glioblastoma: outcomes over time and type of intervention: a systematic evidence based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Case Western University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2020 Apr;147(2):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03451-6. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite aggressive treatment with chemoradiotherapy and maximum surgical resection, survival in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Ongoing efforts are aiming to prolong the lifespan of these patients; however, disparities exist in reported survival values with lack of clear evidence that objectively examines GBM survival trends. We aim to describe the current status and advances in the survival of patients with GBM, by analyzing median overall survival through time and between treatment modalities.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify articles of newly diagnosed glioblastoma from 1978 to 2018. Full-text glioblastoma papers with human subjects, ≥ 18 years old, and n ≥ 25, were included for evaluation.

RESULTS

The central tendency of median overall survival (MOS) was 13.5 months (2.3-29.6) and cumulative 5-year survival was 5.8% (0.01%-29.1%), with a significant difference in survival between studies that predate versus postdate the implementation of temozolomide and radiation, [12.5 (2.3-28) vs 15.6 (3.8-29.6) months, P < 0.001]. In clinical trials, bevacizumab [18.2 (10.6-23.0) months], tumor treating fields (TTF) [20.7 (20.5-20.9) months], and vaccines [19.2 (15.3-26.0) months] reported the highest central measure of median survival.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration with radiotherapy and temozolomide provided a statistically significant increase in survival for patients suffering from glioblastoma. However, the natural history for GBM remains poor. Therapies including TTF pooled values of MOS and provide means of prolonging the survival of GBM patients.

摘要

简介

尽管采用了放化疗和最大程度的手术切除等积极治疗手段,胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的生存率仍然较低。目前正在进行各种努力以延长这些患者的寿命;然而,报告的生存率存在差异,缺乏明确证据客观地检查 GBM 生存率趋势。我们旨在通过分析随时间推移和不同治疗方式的总体中位生存期来描述 GBM 患者的当前状况和生存率进展。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价,以确定 1978 年至 2018 年间新诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的文章。纳入了有人类受试者、年龄≥18 岁且 n≥25 的完整胶质母细胞瘤论文进行评估。

结果

中位总生存期(MOS)的中心趋势为 13.5 个月(2.3-29.6),累积 5 年生存率为 5.8%(0.01%-29.1%),在接受替莫唑胺和放疗的研究中,生存时间存在显著差异,[12.5(2.3-28)与 15.6(3.8-29.6)个月,P<0.001]。在临床试验中,贝伐单抗[18.2(10.6-23.0)个月]、肿瘤治疗电场(TTF)[20.7(20.5-20.9)个月]和疫苗[19.2(15.3-26.0)个月]报告的中位生存期中位数最高。

结论

替莫唑胺联合放疗可使胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存率显著提高。然而,GBM 的自然病史仍然很差。TTF 等疗法提供了延长 GBM 患者生存的手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验