Carlson Julie A, Reddy Krishna, Gaspar Laurie E, Ney Douglas, Kavanagh Brian D, Damek Denise, Lillehei Kevin, Chen Changhu
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA,
J Neurooncol. 2015 Jun;123(2):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1791-4. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
To compare progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated in two consecutive phase II trials of hypofractionated-intensity modulated radiotherapy (hypo-IMRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) with or without bevacizumab (BEV). Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) after biopsy or resection were enrolled on a clinical trial with hypo-IMRT and TMZ (hypo-IMRT/TMZ alone) from 2008 to 2010, or in the second protocol with the same hypo-IMRT and TMZ plus BEV (hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV) from 2010 to 2013. All patients received postoperative hypo-IMRT to the surgical cavity and residual tumor plus margin to a total dose of 60 Gy and to the T2 abnormality with margin to 30 Gy, both in ten fractions. Concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m(2)/day) was given to all patients for 28 consecutive days followed by adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2)/day). Patients enrolled on the hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV trial received concurrent and adjuvant BEV (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Hazard ratios of PFS and OS were compared between trials in a Cox proportional hazards model. Twenty-six patients were enrolled on the hypo-IMRT/TMZ alone trial and 30 patients on the hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV trial. Median follow-up was 13.9 and 14.7 months, respectively. Median PFS was 3.4 months longer with hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV but the difference was not statistically significant (12.8 vs. 9.4 months, p = 0.58). Median (OS) was 16.3 months for both trials. The addition of BEV to TMZ and hypo-IMRT did not improve OS for patients with GBM in two phase II trials with small patient numbers; PFS was longer with BEV, but the difference was not statistically significant.
比较在两项连续的II期试验中接受低分割调强放疗(hypo-IMRT)联合替莫唑胺(TMZ)治疗的患者,加用或不加用贝伐单抗(BEV)时的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。活检或切除术后新诊断为多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的患者于2008年至2010年入组一项采用hypo-IMRT和TMZ(仅hypo-IMRT/TMZ)的临床试验,或于2010年至2013年入组第二项方案,即同样的hypo-IMRT和TMZ加用BEV(hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV)。所有患者均接受术后对手术腔及残留肿瘤加边缘区域进行低分割调强放疗,总剂量60 Gy,分10次进行;对有边缘的T2异常区域放疗至30 Gy,也分10次进行。所有患者均连续28天给予同步TMZ(75 mg/m²/天),随后给予辅助TMZ(150 - 200 mg/m²/天)。入组hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV试验的患者在每个28天周期的第1天和第15天接受同步和辅助BEV(10 mg/kg)。在Cox比例风险模型中比较两项试验之间PFS和OS的风险比。仅hypo-IMRT/TMZ试验入组26例患者,hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV试验入组30例患者。中位随访时间分别为13.9个月和14.7个月。hypo-IMRT/TMZ/BEV组的中位PFS长3.4个月,但差异无统计学意义(12.8个月对9.4个月,p = 0.58)。两项试验的中位总生存期(OS)均为16.3个月。在两项患者数量较少的II期试验中,在TMZ和hypo-IMRT基础上加用BEV并未改善GBM患者的总生存期;BEV组的PFS较长,但差异无统计学意义。