Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Pediatr Transplant. 2020 May;24(3):e13689. doi: 10.1111/petr.13689. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Relative contraindications to adenosine use have included heart transplant and dipyridamole. We previously demonstrated the safety and efficacy of adenosine-induced atrioventricular (AV) block in healthy young heart transplant recipients while suspending dipyridamole therapy (dual antiplatelet agent). This prospective follow-up study evaluated the safety and efficacy of adenosine use in the same cohort of heart transplant recipients while on dipyridamole.
Adenosine was incrementally dosed until AV block occurred (maximum 200 mcg/kg up to 12 mg). The primary outcome was clinically significant asystole (≥12 seconds). Secondary outcomes included maximal adenosine dose, AV block duration, dysrhythmias, and clinical symptoms. Outcomes were compared to the parent study.
Thirty of 39 eligible patients (5-24 years) were tested. No patient (0%, CI 0%-8%) experienced clinically significant asystole. AV block occurred in 29/30 patients (97%, CI 86%-100%). The median dose causing AV block was 50mcg/kg (vs 100 mcg/kg off dipyridamole; P = .011). Seventeen patients (57%, CI 39%-72%) required less adenosine to achieve AV block on dipyridamole; six (20%) required more. AV block occurred at doses ≥25 mcg/kg in all patients. In pairwise comparison to prior testing off dipyridamole, no significant change occurred in AV block duration, frequency of cardiac ectopy, or incidence of reported symptoms. No atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred.
AV block often occurs at twofold lower adenosine doses in healthy young heart transplant recipients taking oral dipyridamole, compared with previous testing of this cohort off dipyridamole. Results suggest that initial dosing of 25 mcg/kg (maximum 0.8 mg) with stepwise escalation poses low risk of prolonged asystole on dipyridamole.
腺苷的相对禁忌证包括心脏移植和双嘧达莫。我们之前曾证明,在暂停双嘧达莫治疗(双联抗血小板药物)的情况下,健康年轻心脏移植受者使用腺苷诱导房室(AV)阻滞是安全有效的。这项前瞻性随访研究评估了在接受心脏移植的同一受者队列中使用腺苷的安全性和有效性,同时使用双嘧达莫。
逐渐给予腺苷直至发生 AV 阻滞(最大 200 mcg/kg 至 12 mg)。主要结局是临床显著的窦性停搏(≥12 秒)。次要结局包括最大腺苷剂量、AV 阻滞持续时间、心律失常和临床症状。结果与原研究进行比较。
39 名符合条件的患者(5-24 岁)中的 30 名进行了测试。无患者(0%,CI 0%-8%)出现临床显著的窦性停搏。29/30 例患者(97%,CI 86%-100%)发生 AV 阻滞。导致 AV 阻滞的中位剂量为 50 mcg/kg(与双嘧达莫停药时的 100 mcg/kg 相比;P =.011)。17 名患者(57%,CI 39%-72%)在服用双嘧达莫时需要较少的腺苷来实现 AV 阻滞;6 名患者(20%)需要更多。所有患者的 AV 阻滞均发生在 25 mcg/kg 以上剂量。与先前在未服用双嘧达莫时的测试相比,AV 阻滞持续时间、心脏异位搏动的频率或报告症状的发生率均无显著变化。未发生心房颤动/扑动。
与先前该队列在未服用双嘧达莫时的测试相比,服用口服双嘧达莫的健康年轻心脏移植受者的 AV 阻滞常发生在两倍低剂量的腺苷。结果表明,初始剂量为 25 mcg/kg(最大 0.8 mg),逐步递增,在服用双嘧达莫时发生长时间窦性停搏的风险较低。