• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的翻修手术结果。

Outcome of revision surgery in recurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):644-648. doi: 10.1177/1120700020911146. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1177/1120700020911146
PMID:32157907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cause of recurrent dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is multifactorial. A re-dislocation rate of up-to 34% following revision is reported. The aim of this study was to determine the re-dislocation rates following revision for recurrent THR dislocation.

METHODOLOGY

Patients who underwent revision for recurrent dislocation between January 2008 and January 2015 were identified. We identified the date and type of primary implant, overall number and reasons for dislocation, revision implant details and complication data.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, 24 patients underwent revision. The median age was 77 (68-85) years, median time to first dislocation was 78 (23-160) months and median number of dislocations was 3 (2-4) with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Socket Mal-Orientation (10) and Abductor deficiency (5) were the main causes of recurrent dislocation. 21 patients (88%) underwent revision of both components, 1 patient underwent isolated cup revision and 2 patients had revision of acetabular component with insertion of a BioBall. There were no dislocations within 90 days of revision surgery. 4 patients had late dislocations (3 recurrent, 1 isolated). There was no significant increase risk of dislocation after revision surgery in the neck of femur group (  0.467).

CONCLUSIONS

We report favourable outcomes for revision of both components for recurrent dislocation with no dislocations within 90 days. The overall late dislocation rate was 16.7%, however, these patients have settled following closed reduction. Due to its multifactorial aetiology, both component revision can be considered in this patient population.

摘要

背景

初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后复发性脱位的原因是多因素的。据报道,翻修后的再脱位率高达 34%。本研究旨在确定复发性 THR 脱位翻修后的再脱位率。

方法

确定了 2008 年 1 月至 2015 年 1 月期间因复发性脱位而行翻修的患者。我们确定了初次植入物的日期和类型、总体脱位次数和脱位原因、翻修植入物的详细信息以及并发症数据。

结果

在 8 年期间,有 24 例患者接受了翻修。患者的中位年龄为 77 岁(68-85 岁),首次脱位的中位时间为 78 个月(23-160 个月),脱位的中位数为 3 次(2-4 次),平均随访时间为 18 个月。臼杯位置不良(10 例)和外展肌缺陷(5 例)是复发性脱位的主要原因。21 例(88%)患者行双组件翻修,1 例患者行单纯臼杯翻修,2 例患者行髋臼侧组件翻修并置入 BioBall。翻修术后 90 天内无脱位。4 例患者发生晚期脱位(3 例复发性脱位,1 例单纯性脱位)。股骨颈组翻修术后脱位风险无显著增加(  0.467)。

结论

我们报告了双组件翻修治疗复发性脱位的良好结果,翻修术后 90 天内无脱位。总的晚期脱位率为 16.7%,但这些患者经闭合复位后已稳定。由于其多因素病因,在这一患者群体中可以考虑行双组件翻修。

相似文献

1
Outcome of revision surgery in recurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的翻修手术结果。
Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):644-648. doi: 10.1177/1120700020911146. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).翻修全髋关节置换术后双动杯脱位的危险因素:配对病例对照研究(16 例与 48 例对照)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Outcome and risk factors of failures associated with revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation.复发性脱位翻修全髋关节置换术相关失败的结局及危险因素
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1801-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03814-2. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Cementation of a dual-mobility cup into a well-fixed cementless shell in patients with high risk of dislocation undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.在接受翻修全髋关节置换术的高脱位风险患者中,将双动杯固定于固定良好的非骨水泥髋臼壳内。
Hip Int. 2021 Jan;31(1):97-102. doi: 10.1177/1120700019873617. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Treatment strategies for recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: relationship between cause of dislocation and type of revision surgery.全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的治疗策略:脱位原因与翻修手术类型的关系。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 29;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06355-4.
6
Utilizing Dual Mobility Components for First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability.初次翻修全髋关节置换术治疗不稳定时采用双动组件。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):505-509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
7
Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years).髋关节后脱位全髋关节置换术的病程:一项连续 232 例患者的 10 年平均随访(范围,1-22 年)研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?在翻修全髋关节置换术中,受限衬垫脱位能否通过双动结构挽救?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000026.
9
Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.采用骨水泥型双动髋臼杯治疗复发性脱位的5至13年随访结果
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):513-519. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
10
Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.现代双动式假体的风险因素和失败模式。系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 14;22(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04404-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Relating total hip replacement and acetabular cup positioning with outcome: A systematic review.全髋关节置换术与髋臼杯定位和预后的关系:一项系统综述。
Bioinformation. 2025 Feb 28;21(2):145-154. doi: 10.6026/973206300210145. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the rate of successful closed reduction of dislocated dual mobility cups following complex revision hip arthroplasty?复杂翻修髋关节置换术后脱位双动杯闭合复位的成功率是多少?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6439-6445. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04826-w. Epub 2023 Mar 31.