Klemt Christian, Chen Wenhao, Bounajem Georges, Tirumala Venkatsaiakhil, Xiong Liang, Kwon Young-Min
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1801-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03814-2. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Recurrent dislocation represents the third most common cause of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is a paucity of information on the outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation. In this study, we investigated (1) clinical outcomes of patients that underwent revision THA for recurrent dislocation, and (2) potential risk factors associated with treatment failure in patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation.
We retrospectively reviewed 211 consecutive cases of revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation, 81 implanted with a constrained liner and 130 with a non-constrained liner with a large-diameter femoral head (> 32 mm). Patient- and implant-related risk factors were analyzed in multivariate regression analysis.
At 4.6-year follow-up, 32 of 211 patients (15.1%) underwent re-revision surgery. The most common causes for re-revision included infection (14 patients) and dislocation (10 patients). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrates a 5-year survival probability of 77% for patients that underwent revision THA for recurrent dislocation. Osteoporosis, obesity (BMI ≥ 40), spine disease and abductor deficiency are independent risk factors for failure of revision surgery for recurrent dislocation. Liner type (constrained vs. non-constrained) was found not to be associated with failure of revision THA for recurrent dislocation (p = 0.44).
This study suggests that THA revision for recurrent dislocation is associated with a high re-revision rate of 15% at mid-term follow-up. Osteoporosis, obesity (BMI ≥ 40) spine disease and abductor deficiency were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for failure of revision THA for recurrent dislocation.
Level III, case-control retrospective analysis.
复发性脱位是全髋关节置换术(THA)后翻修手术的第三大常见原因。然而,关于复发性脱位翻修全髋关节置换术的结果,相关信息较少。在本研究中,我们调查了:(1)因复发性脱位接受翻修THA的患者的临床结果,以及(2)因复发性脱位接受翻修全髋关节置换术的患者治疗失败的潜在风险因素。
我们回顾性分析了211例因复发性脱位进行翻修全髋关节置换术的连续病例,其中81例植入了限制性衬垫,130例植入了大直径股骨头(>32mm)的非限制性衬垫。在多变量回归分析中分析了患者和植入物相关的风险因素。
在4.6年的随访中,211例患者中有32例(15.1%)接受了再次翻修手术。再次翻修的最常见原因包括感染(14例患者)和脱位(10例患者)。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,因复发性脱位接受翻修THA的患者5年生存率为77%。骨质疏松症、肥胖(BMI≥40)、脊柱疾病和外展肌缺陷是复发性脱位翻修手术失败的独立风险因素。发现衬垫类型(限制性与非限制性)与复发性脱位翻修THA的失败无关(p=0.44)。
本研究表明,复发性脱位的THA翻修在中期随访时再次翻修率高达15%。骨质疏松症、肥胖(BMI≥40)、脊柱疾病和外展肌缺陷被证明是复发性脱位翻修THA失败的独立风险因素。
III级,病例对照回顾性分析。