Olesen Thomas B, Pareek Manan, Stidsen Jacob V, Blicher Marie K, Rasmussen Susanne, Vishram-Nielsen Julie K K, Maagaard Louise, H Olsen Michael
Department of Internal Medicine, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.
Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Blood Press. 2020 Aug;29(4):232-240. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1735930. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
The objective of this study was to test if combining antecedent systolic blood pressure (SBP) with traditional risk factors and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) improves risk stratification for subsequent cardiovascular disease. 1910 subjects participated in this study. Antecedent SBP was defined as the average of measurements obtained in 1982 and in 1987. Current SBP was obtained in 1993. HMOD were examined in 1993. HMOD was defined as either atherosclerotic plaque(s), increased pulse wave velocity, increased urine albumin creatinine ratio (above the 90th percentile) or left ventricular hypertrophy. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmia were obtained from national registries. Subjects were divided into two age categories: a middle-aged group (aged 41 or 51) and an older group (aged 61 or 71). From 1993 to 2010, 425 events were observed. In multivariable analysis with both current and antecedent SBP adjusted for traditional risk factors, current SBP was associated with each measure of HMOD whilst antecedent SBP was not significantly associated with urine albumin creatinine ratio in the older group, LVMI in the middle-aged group, or the presence of plaque in any of the age groups (all > 0.15). When current and antecedent SBP were evaluated together, current SBP was not associated with MACE in the middle-aged subgroup [HR = 1.09 (0.96-1.22), = 0.18] but remained associated with MACE in the older subgroup [HR = 1.21 (1.10-1.34), < 0.01]. Contrariwise, antecedent SBP was only associated with MACE in the middle-aged subgroup [HR = 1.24 (1.04-1.48), = 0.02]. Adding antecedent SBP to traditional risk factors did not improve the predictive accuracy of the survival model. In healthy non-medicated middle-aged subjects, antecedent SBP is associated with cardiovascular outcome independently of current BP, traditional risk factors and HMOD. However, improvement in risk stratification seems to be limited.
本研究的目的是检验将既往收缩压(SBP)与传统危险因素及高血压介导的器官损害(HMOD)相结合是否能改善对后续心血管疾病的风险分层。1910名受试者参与了本研究。既往SBP定义为1982年和1987年所测血压的平均值。当前SBP于1993年测得。HMOD于1993年进行检查。HMOD定义为动脉粥样硬化斑块、脉搏波速度增加、尿白蛋白肌酐比值升高(高于第90百分位数)或左心室肥厚。包括心肌梗死、脑血管疾病、心力衰竭和心律失常在内的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)来自国家登记处。受试者分为两个年龄组:中年组(41岁或51岁)和老年组(61岁或71岁)。从1993年到2010年,观察到425起事件。在对传统危险因素进行校正的同时纳入当前和既往SBP的多变量分析中,当前SBP与HMOD的各项指标相关,而既往SBP在老年组中与尿白蛋白肌酐比值、中年组中与左心室质量指数或任何年龄组中的斑块存在均无显著相关性(所有P>0.15)。当同时评估当前和既往SBP时,当前SBP在中年亚组中与MACE无关[风险比(HR)=1.09(0.96 - 1.22),P = 0.18],但在老年亚组中仍与MACE相关[HR = 1.21(1.10 - 1.34),P<0.01]。相反,既往SBP仅在中年亚组中与MACE相关[HR = 1.24(1.04 - 1.48),P = 0.02]。将既往SBP添加到传统危险因素中并未提高生存模型的预测准确性。在健康未用药的中年受试者中,既往SBP独立于当前血压、传统危险因素和HMOD与心血管结局相关。然而,风险分层的改善似乎有限。