St John Andrew
Drajon Management, Perth WA 6050, Australia.
Clin Biochem Rev. 2020 Feb;41(1):3-11. doi: 10.33176/AACB-19-00035.
The pressure on healthcare budgets including laboratory medicine is relentless and the focus on activities and costs remains the dominant funding model of laboratory medicine everywhere. The limitations of this model are well documented and for a decade or more laboratory professions worldwide have started looking at alternative models where the value of laboratory medicine and its impact on patient outcomes are the predominant driving force. There are multiple ways to determine the value of a medical test, particularly if one takes into consideration its impact upon the complete clinical pathway. Thus various approaches to value determination are being explored by a number of international organisations. These organisations will be reviewed below, including one which uses the concept of a value proposition that describes in detail how a test should be implemented by measuring its clinical, operational and economic impact. All approaches for determination of value require professional leadership. There is a need for research of varying types including that related to translating global evidence into local practice, a key challenge facing laboratory medicine and healthcare generally. Another challenge is to think and act beyond the silo of the laboratory to achieve greater collaboration with those colleagues more directly involved in patient care.
包括检验医学在内的医疗保健预算面临的压力持续不断,关注活动和成本仍然是各地检验医学的主要资金模式。这种模式的局限性已有充分记录,在过去十多年里,全球的检验医学专业人员已开始探索替代模式,在这些模式中,检验医学的价值及其对患者治疗结果的影响成为主要驱动力。确定医学检验价值的方法有多种,尤其是如果考虑到其对整个临床路径的影响。因此,一些国际组织正在探索各种价值确定方法。以下将对这些组织进行综述,其中包括一个采用价值主张概念的组织,该概念详细描述了如何通过衡量检验的临床、操作和经济影响来实施检验。所有价值确定方法都需要专业引领。需要开展各种类型的研究,包括将全球证据转化为本地实践的相关研究,这是检验医学乃至整个医疗保健领域面临的一项关键挑战。另一个挑战是突破检验医学的局限去思考和行动,以加强与那些更直接参与患者护理的同事的合作。