Suppr超能文献

小动物兽医与大动物兽医的一般道德推理比较。

Comparison of the general moral reasoning of small animal veterinarians vs large animal veterinarians.

作者信息

Self D J, Safford S K, Shelton G C

机构信息

College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-1114.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988 Dec 15;193(12):1509-12.

PMID:3215809
Abstract

This project was developed to gather data on the general moral reasoning of practicing veterinarians and to compare the responses of small animal veterinarians vs large animal veterinarians and of male veterinarians vs female veterinarians. Using the Defining Issues Test for assessing moral reasoning, it was found that there is no significant difference between the levels of moral reasoning of small animal and large animal veterinarians. However, a slightly significant (P = 0.045) difference was found between the levels of moral reasoning of male and female veterinarians. Explanations of these findings are given. This report provides baseline data on the moral reasoning of veterinarians, which can serve as a foundation and stimulus for comparison in other studies.

摘要

开展该项目旨在收集执业兽医的一般道德推理数据,并比较小动物兽医与大动物兽医以及男性兽医与女性兽医的回答。通过使用定义问题测试来评估道德推理,发现小动物兽医和大动物兽医的道德推理水平之间没有显著差异。然而,发现男性和女性兽医的道德推理水平之间存在轻微显著差异(P = 0.045)。文中给出了这些发现的解释。本报告提供了兽医道德推理的基线数据,可为其他研究中的比较提供基础和激励。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验