Self D J, Safford S K, Shelton G C
College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-1114.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988 Dec 15;193(12):1509-12.
This project was developed to gather data on the general moral reasoning of practicing veterinarians and to compare the responses of small animal veterinarians vs large animal veterinarians and of male veterinarians vs female veterinarians. Using the Defining Issues Test for assessing moral reasoning, it was found that there is no significant difference between the levels of moral reasoning of small animal and large animal veterinarians. However, a slightly significant (P = 0.045) difference was found between the levels of moral reasoning of male and female veterinarians. Explanations of these findings are given. This report provides baseline data on the moral reasoning of veterinarians, which can serve as a foundation and stimulus for comparison in other studies.
开展该项目旨在收集执业兽医的一般道德推理数据,并比较小动物兽医与大动物兽医以及男性兽医与女性兽医的回答。通过使用定义问题测试来评估道德推理,发现小动物兽医和大动物兽医的道德推理水平之间没有显著差异。然而,发现男性和女性兽医的道德推理水平之间存在轻微显著差异(P = 0.045)。文中给出了这些发现的解释。本报告提供了兽医道德推理的基线数据,可为其他研究中的比较提供基础和激励。