Self D J, Olivarez M, Baldwin D C, Shadduck J A
Department of Humanities in Medicine, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-1114, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996 Dec 15;209(12):2002-4.
To clarify the relationship between veterinary medical education and moral development in response to 2 previous studies that presented conflicting evidence that the experience of veterinary medical education may inhibit moral development.
The Defining Issues Test (DIT) was used to survey the moral reasoning of veterinary medical students at the beginning and end of their education.
First and fourth-year veterinary medical students.
The moral reasoning of 98 veterinary medical students was assessed at the beginning of their first semester of veterinary medical education and again, 4 years later, at the end of their last semester to determine whether their moral reasoning scores would reflect the expected maturity-related increases usually found at this age range and education level.
The DIT scores ranged from 8.3 to 70.0 for first-year students and from 16.7 to 76.7 for fourth-year students. The first-year mean was 44.0 and the fourth-year mean was 45.4. The mean change of +1.45 points was not significant. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and age; however, there was a significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and gender, with females scoring higher on the first and second test. The difference in the rate of change between tests by gender was not significant.
This study appears to confirm the findings of an earlier study suggesting veterinary medical education inhibits an increase of moral reasoning in veterinary medical students.
针对之前两项呈现相互矛盾证据的研究,即兽医医学教育经历可能会抑制道德发展,阐明兽医医学教育与道德发展之间的关系。
使用界定问题测试(DIT)对兽医医学专业学生在其教育开始时和结束时的道德推理进行调查。
一年级和四年级兽医医学专业学生。
在98名兽医医学专业学生兽医医学教育第一学期开始时评估其道德推理,并在4年后最后一学期结束时再次评估,以确定他们的道德推理分数是否会反映出在这个年龄范围和教育水平通常会出现的与成熟度相关的预期增长。
一年级学生的DIT分数范围为8.3至70.0,四年级学生为16.7至76.7。一年级平均分为44.0,四年级平均分为45.4。平均变化1.45分不显著。统计分析未揭示道德推理分数与年龄之间存在任何显著相关性;然而,道德推理分数与性别之间存在显著相关性,女性在第一次和第二次测试中的得分更高。按性别划分的测试之间变化率的差异不显著。
本研究似乎证实了早期一项研究的结果,即兽医医学教育会抑制兽医医学专业学生道德推理能力的提高。