Manzoni Giuseppina, Oltolini Alice, Perra Silvia, Muraca Emanuele, Ciardullo Stefano, Pizzi Mattia, Castoldi Giovanna, Lattuada Guido, Pizzi Pietro, Perseghin Gianluca
Department of Medicine and Rehabilitation, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Feb 24;13:489-497. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S228229. eCollection 2020.
Insulin resistance and diabetes may influence separately or in combination whole body energy metabolism.
To assess the impact of insulin resistance and/or overt type 2 diabetes on resting energy expenditure (REE) in class 3 obese individuals.
Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of a set of data about individuals attending the outpatients service of a single center of bariatric surgery between January 2015 and December 2017.
We screened 382 patients in which abnormal thyroid function was excluded, and segregated them in three groups of subjects: patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM; n=70), non-diabetic insulin-resistant patients with HOMA-IR ≥ 3 (n=236), non-diabetic insulin-sensitive patients with HOMA-IR < 3 (n=75).
Resting energy expenditure (REE), body composition and insulin resistance assessed using indirect calorimetry, bioimpedance and HOMA-IR.
Non-diabetic insulin-sensitive patients resulted to be younger, with lower BMI and higher prevalence of female subjects; meanwhile, non-diabetic but insulin-resistant patients and T2DM patients were not different in terms of anthropometric parameters. REE was higher in T2DM than in non-diabetic insulin-resistant and insulin-sensitive individuals when expressed as percent of the predicted REE (based on Harris Benedict equation) (p<0.0001) or when adjusted for kg of free fat mass (p<0.0001) and was found to be higher also in insulin-resistant vs insulin-sensitive patients (p<0.001). The respiratory quotient was different between groups (0.87±0.11, 0.86±0.12 and 0.91±0.14 in T2DM, insulin-resistant and insulin-sensitive patients, respectively; p<0.03). Regression analysis confirmed that HOMA-IR was independently associated with the REE (R=0.110, p<0.001).
Class 3 obese patients with normal insulin sensitivity are characterized by reduced fasting REE in comparison to insulin-resistant obese patients and obese patients with short duration of diabetes supporting the hypothesis that down-regulation of nutrients' oxidative disposal may represent an adaptation of energy metabolism in obese individuals with preserved insulin sensitivity.
胰岛素抵抗和糖尿病可能单独或共同影响全身能量代谢。
评估胰岛素抵抗和/或显性2型糖尿病对3级肥胖个体静息能量消耗(REE)的影响。
对2015年1月至2017年12月在单一减肥手术中心门诊就诊的个体的一组数据进行回顾性横断面分析。
我们筛选了382例排除甲状腺功能异常的患者,并将他们分为三组:2型糖尿病患者(T2DM;n = 70)、HOMA-IR≥3的非糖尿病胰岛素抵抗患者(n = 236)、HOMA-IR<3的非糖尿病胰岛素敏感患者(n = 75)。
使用间接测热法、生物电阻抗和HOMA-IR评估静息能量消耗(REE)、身体成分和胰岛素抵抗。
非糖尿病胰岛素敏感患者更年轻,BMI更低,女性患病率更高;同时,非糖尿病但胰岛素抵抗患者和T2DM患者在人体测量参数方面没有差异。当以预测REE的百分比(基于Harris Benedict方程)表示时(p<0.0001),或在根据游离脂肪质量千克数进行调整时(p<0.0001),T2DM患者的REE高于非糖尿病胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素敏感个体,并且在胰岛素抵抗患者与胰岛素敏感患者中也发现REE更高(p<0.001)。各组之间的呼吸商不同(T2DM、胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素敏感患者分别为0.87±0.11、0.86±0.12和0.91±0.14;p<0.03)。回归分析证实HOMA-IR与REE独立相关(R = 0.110,p<0.001)。
与胰岛素抵抗肥胖患者和糖尿病病程短的肥胖患者相比,胰岛素敏感性正常的3级肥胖患者的空腹REE降低,这支持了以下假设:营养物质氧化处理的下调可能代表了胰岛素敏感性正常的肥胖个体能量代谢中的一种适应。