Leigh J, Griffits R K, Ellis C G
National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety, Joint Coal Board Medical Division, New South Wales, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Dec;65(6):2714-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.6.2714.
Respiratory enthalpy change, rectal temperature, and heart rate of mine rescue workers exercising at a metabolic energy production rate of 4 met (1 met-58.15 W.m-2) in a 40 degrees C saturated environment, wearing closed-circuit breathing apparatus, were continuously measured in 10 volunteer subjects. The effects of using liquid O2 and compressed O2 apparatus were compared in each subject. Evaporative heat exchange was much greater with the liquid O2 type of apparatus, causing a significantly lower rate of rise of rectal temperature and heart rate. Convective heat exchange was negligible. Mean values for evaporative heat loss (maximum) were 61 +/- 16 (SD) W with liquid O2 and 20 +/- 18 W with compressed O2 (P less than 0.0001, 2-sided t test). Mean values for rectal temperature (rate of increase) were 0.022 +/- 0.009 (SD) degrees C.min-1 for liquid O2 and 0.036 +/- 0.015 degrees C.min-1 for compressed O2 (P less than 0.005, 2-sided paired t test). Mean values for heart rate (rate of increase) were 2.64 +/- 0.74 (SD) min-2 for liquid O2 and 3.27 +/- 0.89 min-2 for compressed O2 (P less than 0.02, 2-sided paired t test). This study quantifies, for the first time, the respiratory enthalpy change in exercising heat-stressed mine rescue workers and shows, from a physiological point of view, that the liquid O2 apparatus is clearly superior to the compressed O2 apparatus.
在40摄氏度的饱和环境中,对10名志愿者佩戴闭路呼吸器、以4倍代谢当量(1倍代谢当量 = 58.15瓦·平方米⁻²)的代谢能量产生速率进行锻炼的矿山救援人员的呼吸焓变、直肠温度和心率进行了连续测量。比较了每位受试者使用液氧和压缩氧气设备的效果。使用液氧型设备时蒸发散热要大得多,导致直肠温度和心率的上升速率明显更低。对流散热可忽略不计。液氧的蒸发热损失(最大值)平均值为61±16(标准差)瓦,压缩氧气为20±18瓦(双侧t检验,P<0.0001)。直肠温度(上升速率)的平均值,液氧为0.022±0.009(标准差)摄氏度·分钟⁻¹,压缩氧气为0.036±0.015摄氏度·分钟⁻¹(双侧配对t检验,P<0.005)。心率(上升速率)的平均值,液氧为2.64±0.74(标准差)次·分钟⁻²,压缩氧气为3.27±0.89次·分钟⁻²(双侧配对t检验,P<0.02)。本研究首次对受热应激的正在锻炼的矿山救援人员的呼吸焓变进行了量化,并从生理学角度表明液氧设备明显优于压缩氧气设备。