Suppr超能文献

用于预防开颅术后恶心和呕吐的止吐药物:一项更新的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Anti-emetic Drugs for Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Craniotomy: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yijing, Chang Jing

机构信息

Department of Health Care, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 25;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00040. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

There is uncertainty about the effect of antiemetic drugs (AED) for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after craniotomy. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of AED for PONV. We searched online databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wiley, Elsevier Science Direct, Ovid LWW, and Springer for publications from 1985 to June 2018. Adults undergoing craniotomy with the prophylactic use of at least one AED were included. The primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV) during the first and second day. A total of 1,433 participants from 17 clinical trials were enrolled in this Network Meta-Analysis (NMA). Compared to placebo, ramosetron was the most effective treatment for PON 24 h after surgery (OR = 0.063, 95% Crl: 0.006-0.45), with a 69.2% probability. On the other hand, for POV, droperidol was the best treatment during the first 2 h with a 71.1% probability (OR = 0.029, 95% Crl: 0.003-0.25); while fosaprepitant was the most effective treatment at 0-24 h (OR = 0.027, 95% Crl: 0.007-0.094; 66.9% probability) and 0-48 h (OR = 0.036, 95% Crl: 0.006-0.18; 56.6% probability). Besides, ramosetron showed a significantly higher incidence of complete response (OR = 29. 95% Crl: 1.4-6.5e + 02), as well as lower requirement for rescue AED (OR = 0.022, 95% Crl: 0.001-0.2). Granisetron was associated with the lowest incidence of headache and excessive sedation. Compared with placebo, ramosetron appears to be the best prophylactic treatment for PON 24 h after craniotomy, with higher complete responses. Fosaprepitant appears to be the most effective prophylaxis option for POV on the first 0-24 and 0-48 h. Both may be better applied in combination with perioperative dexamethasone. These findings may guide clinicians to provide improved pharmacological prophylaxis for PONV after craniotomy with fewer adverse effects.

摘要

关于抗呕吐药物(AED)预防开颅术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的效果存在不确定性。在本研究中,我们评估了AED预防PONV的有效性和安全性。我们检索了包括Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Wiley、爱思唯尔科学Direct、Ovid LWW和Springer在内的在线数据库,以获取1985年至2018年6月的出版物。纳入了接受开颅手术并预防性使用至少一种AED的成年人。主要结局是术后第一天和第二天的术后恶心(PON)和术后呕吐(POV)发生率。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)共纳入了来自17项临床试验的1433名参与者。与安慰剂相比,雷莫司琼是术后24小时预防PON最有效的治疗方法(OR = 0.063,95%可信区间:0.006 - 0.45),概率为69.2%。另一方面,对于POV,氟哌利多在前2小时是最佳治疗方法,概率为71.1%(OR = 0.029,95%可信区间:0.003 - 0.25);而福沙匹坦在0 - 24小时(OR = 0.027,95%可信区间:0.007 - 0.094;概率为66.9%)和0 - 48小时(OR = 0.036,95%可信区间:0.006 - 0.18;概率为56.6%)是最有效的治疗方法。此外,雷莫司琼的完全缓解发生率显著更高(OR = 29. 95%可信区间:1.4 - 6.5e + 02),以及对急救AED的需求更低(OR = 0.022,95%可信区间:0.001 - 0.2)。格拉司琼与最低的头痛和过度镇静发生率相关。与安慰剂相比,雷莫司琼似乎是开颅术后24小时预防PON的最佳治疗方法,完全缓解率更高。福沙匹坦似乎是0 - 24小时和0 - 48小时预防POV最有效的选择。两者可能与围手术期地塞米松联合应用效果更好。这些发现可能指导临床医生为开颅术后PONV提供更好的药物预防,且不良反应更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ce8/7052291/231bde41b49c/fmed-07-00040-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验