Demir Esin, Ataoglu Hanife
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Selçuk University Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Feb;20(1):9-17. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.9. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
This study aimed to compare the pain levels during anesthesia and the efficacy of the QuickSleeper intraosseous (IO) injection system and conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
This prospective randomized clinical trial included 30 patients (16 women, 14 men) with bilateral symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars. Thirty subjects randomly received either the IO injection or conventional IANB at two successive appointments. A split-mouth design was used in which each patient underwent treatment of a tooth with one of the techniques and treatment of the homologous contralateral tooth with the other technique. The subjects received 1.8 mL of 2% articaine. Subjects' demographic data, pain levels during anesthesia induction, tooth extractions, and mouth opening on postoperative first, third, and seventh days were recorded. Pain assessment ratings were recorded using the 100-mm visual analog scale. The latency and duration of the anesthetic effect, complications, and operation duration were also analyzed in this study. The duration of anesthetic effect was considered using an electric pulp test and by probing the soft tissue with an explorer.
Thirty patients aged between 18 and 47 years (mean age, 25 years) were included in this study. The IO injection was significantly less painful with lesser soft tissue numbness and quicker onset of anesthesia and lingual mucosa anesthesia with single needle penetration than conventional IANB. Moreover, 19 out of 30 patients (63%) preferred transcortical anesthesia. Mouth opening on postoperative first day was significantly better with intraosseous injection than with conventional IANB (P = 0.013).
The IO anesthetic system is a good alternative to IANB for extraction of the third molar with less pain during anesthesia induction and sufficient depth of anesthesia for the surgical procedure.
本研究旨在比较在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中,使用QuickSleeper骨内(IO)注射系统和传统下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)时的麻醉疼痛程度及效果。
这项前瞻性随机临床试验纳入了30例患者(16例女性,14例男性),均有双侧对称的下颌阻生第三磨牙。30名受试者在连续两次就诊时随机接受IO注射或传统IANB。采用双侧对照设计,即每位患者一侧牙齿采用一种技术治疗,对侧同名牙齿采用另一种技术治疗。受试者接受1.8毫升2%的阿替卡因。记录受试者的人口统计学数据、麻醉诱导期、拔牙时及术后第1、3和7天的张口度时的疼痛程度。使用100毫米视觉模拟量表记录疼痛评估评分。本研究还分析了麻醉效果的潜伏期和持续时间、并发症及手术时间。通过牙髓电测试和用探针探查软组织来评估麻醉效果的持续时间。
本研究纳入了30例年龄在18至47岁之间(平均年龄25岁)的患者。与传统IANB相比,IO注射疼痛明显减轻,软组织麻木程度较轻,单针穿刺时麻醉起效更快,舌黏膜麻醉效果更好。此外,30例患者中有19例(63%)更喜欢经皮质麻醉。骨内注射术后第1天的张口度明显优于传统IANB(P = 0.013)。
对于拔除第三磨牙,IO麻醉系统是IANB的良好替代方法,在麻醉诱导期疼痛较轻,且为手术提供足够的麻醉深度。