Anvardeen Kalilur, Rao Rajeev, Hazra Samir, Hay Karen, Dai Hongyan, Stoyanov Nik, Birnie David, Dwivedi Girish, Chan Kwan Leung
Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Cardiology, St John of God Hospital, Midland, Western Australia, Australia.
CJC Open. 2019 Oct 31;1(6):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.10.002. eCollection 2019 Nov.
Endocardial lead in the right ventricle is recognized as a cause for tricuspid regurgitation (TR), but the mechanism remains elusive. We sought to evaluate lead-specific features on the development of TR after endocardial lead implantation.
This was a prospective single-center study. The patients underwent 2-dimensional echocardiograms before endocardial lead implantation and at follow-up visits at 4 to 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. We assessed the position of the endocardial lead at the tricuspid annulus by 3-dimensional echocardiography, the tricuspid leaflet interference by the endocardial lead by both 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiography, and the degree of lead slack radiologically. Patient characteristics and lead-related factors were evaluated in the prediction of new or worse TR by univariable and multivariable analyses.
New or increased TR was detected in 38 of 128 patients at the 12-month follow-up. The postero-septal commissure was the most common lead position, and tricuspid leaflet interference detected in 21 patients was associated with a noncommissural lead position. The implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead was not associated with new TR compared with the implantation of a pacemaker lead. Tricuspid leaflet interference ( < 0.0001), but not lead position or lead slack, was the only lead-specific factor associated with the development of TR.
After right ventricle endocardial lead implantation, leaflet interference determined by echocardiography, but not the nature of the lead, the lead position at the tricuspid annulus, and the radiological lead slack, predicted TR development at 1 year postimplantation.
右心室内膜导线被认为是三尖瓣反流(TR)的一个病因,但其机制仍不清楚。我们试图评估内膜导线植入后TR发生发展过程中导线的特定特征。
这是一项前瞻性单中心研究。患者在植入内膜导线前以及在4至6周、6个月和12个月的随访时接受二维超声心动图检查。我们通过三维超声心动图评估内膜导线在三尖瓣环处的位置,通过二维和三维超声心动图评估内膜导线对三尖瓣小叶的干扰,并通过影像学评估导线松弛程度。通过单变量和多变量分析评估患者特征和导线相关因素对新发或更严重TR的预测价值。
在128例患者的12个月随访中,38例检测到新发或加重的TR。后间隔交界是最常见的导线位置,21例检测到的三尖瓣小叶干扰与非交界导线位置有关。与植入起搏器导线相比,植入植入式心律转复除颤器导线与新发TR无关。三尖瓣小叶干扰(<0.0001)而非导线位置或导线松弛是与TR发生发展相关的唯一导线特定因素。
右心室内膜导线植入后,超声心动图确定的小叶干扰而非导线类型、导线在三尖瓣环处的位置以及影像学上的导线松弛可预测植入后1年TR的发生。