Suppr超能文献

《诊断性婴幼儿及学龄前儿童评估-李克特量表版:编制、同时效度验证及重测信度》

The Diagnostic Infant Preschool Assessment-Likert Version: Preparation, Concurrent Construct Validation, and Test-Retest Reliability.

作者信息

Scheeringa Michael S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;30(5):326-334. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0168. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Abstract

The Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment was revised to include Likert ratings (DIPA-L) to give a broader range of severity ratings that may have greater utility for clinical and research purposes. In addition, the instrument was updated for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5), and two types of Likert ratings-frequency versus problem intensity-were explored for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Concurrent construct validation and test-retest reliability were examined for the five most common disorders seen in very young children in outpatient clinics: PTSD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A sixth disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), which was created in DSM-5, was tested for the first time. Functional impairment was also examined. The caregivers of 58 two- through six-year-old children (57 mothers and 1 father) were recruited from an outpatient clinic. They were interviewed at Time 1, and 52 were reinterviewed at Time 2 by research assistants (children's age 4.7 years, standard deviation 1.2). Few differences were found between the ratings of frequency versus problem intensity for PTSD symptoms. Tests of concurrent criterion validation were acceptable for all disorders when compared against disorder-specific questionnaires; the range of Pearson correlation coefficients was 0.56-0.94. A trend for attenuation of diagnoses from Time 1 to Time 2 was evident, but not statistically significant. Test-retest reliabilities were strong when examined with continuous Likert scores, except for GAD (the range of intraclass correlation coefficients values was 0.29-0.91, but were less consistent for categorical disorder-level status [the range of Cohen's κs was 0.35-0.79]). The range of internal consistencies was 0.78-0.95, excluding DMDD, which could not be calculated. The updated and revised DIPA-L demonstrated many acceptable features of a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of very young children. While the findings are tentative given the small sample size, the DIPA-L is the only diagnostic instrument for young children with a replication, tested in clinic populations, updated for DSM-5, with psychometrics for functional impairment, and has Likert ratings.

摘要

《诊断性婴幼儿及学龄前儿童评估量表》进行了修订,纳入了李克特量表评分(DIPA-L),以提供更广泛的严重程度评分范围,这可能对临床和研究目的更有用。此外,该工具根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)进行了更新,并针对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状探讨了两种李克特量表评分——频率与问题强度。对门诊诊所中幼儿最常见的五种疾病进行了同时效度验证和重测信度检验:PTSD、注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍、分离焦虑障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)。首次对DSM-5中新增的第六种疾病——破坏性行为障碍(DMDD)进行了测试。还对功能损害进行了检查。从门诊诊所招募了58名2至6岁儿童的照料者(57名母亲和1名父亲)。他们在时间1接受了访谈,52人在时间2由研究助理再次访谈(儿童年龄4.7岁,标准差1.2)。PTSD症状的频率评分与问题强度评分之间几乎没有差异。与特定疾病问卷相比,所有疾病的同时效度验证测试都可以接受;皮尔逊相关系数范围为0.56至0.94。从时间1到时间2诊断有减弱的趋势,但无统计学意义。除GAD外,用连续李克特量表评分检验时重测信度很强(组内相关系数值范围为0.29至0.91,但分类疾病水平状态的一致性较差[科恩kappa系数范围为0.35至0.79])。内部一致性范围为0.78至0.95,不包括无法计算的DMDD。更新和修订后的DIPA-L展示了作为评估幼儿的有效且可靠工具的许多可接受特征。鉴于样本量较小,研究结果具有初步性,但DIPA-L是唯一一款在临床人群中进行了重复测试、根据DSM-5更新、具有功能损害心理测量指标且有李克特量表评分的幼儿诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验