• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何得出这个数字?实施预测分析的利益相关者需求:实施前定性研究。

"How did you get to this number?" Stakeholder needs for implementing predictive analytics: a pre-implementation qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):709-716. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa021.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa021
PMID:32159774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647269/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Predictive analytics are potentially powerful tools, but to improve healthcare delivery, they must be carefully integrated into healthcare organizations. Our objective was to identify facilitators, challenges, and recommendations for implementing a novel predictive algorithm which aims to prospectively identify patients with high preventable utilization to proactively involve them in preventative interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In preparation for implementing the predictive algorithm in 3 organizations, we interviewed 3 stakeholder groups: health systems operations (eg, chief medical officers, department chairs), informatics personnel, and potential end users (eg, physicians, nurses, social workers). We applied thematic analysis to derive key themes and categorize them into the dimensions of Sittig and Singh's original sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Recruiting and analysis were conducted iteratively until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Forty-nine interviews were conducted in 3 healthcare organizations. Technical components of the implementation (hardware and software) raised fewer concerns than alignment with sociotechnical factors. Stakeholders wanted decision support based on the algorithm to be clear and actionable and incorporated into current workflows. However, how to make this disease-independent classification tool actionable was perceived as a challenge, and appropriate patient interventions informed by the algorithm appeared likely to require substantial external and institutional resources. Stakeholders also described the criticality of trust, credibility, and interpretability of the predictive algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although predictive analytics can classify patients with high accuracy, they cannot advance healthcare processes and outcomes without careful implementation that takes into account the sociotechnical system. Key stakeholders have strong perceptions about facilitators and challenges to shape successful implementation.

摘要

目的

预测分析是一种很有潜力的工具,但要改善医疗服务,就必须将其谨慎地融入医疗保健组织中。我们的目的是确定在 3 家医疗机构实施一种新颖的预测算法的促进因素、挑战和建议,该算法旨在前瞻性地识别具有高可预防利用率的患者,以便主动让他们参与预防干预。

材料与方法

在准备将预测算法应用于 3 家机构时,我们对 3 个利益相关者群体进行了访谈:医疗系统运营人员(例如首席医疗官、部门主管)、信息人员和潜在的最终用户(例如医生、护士、社工)。我们应用主题分析得出关键主题,并将其归类为 Sittig 和 Singh 原始社会技术模型的维度,以研究复杂自适应医疗保健系统中的健康信息技术。招募和分析是迭代进行的,直到达到主题饱和。

结果

在 3 家医疗机构进行了 49 次访谈。实施的技术组件(硬件和软件)引起的关注少于与社会技术因素的一致性。利益相关者希望基于算法的决策支持清晰且可操作,并纳入当前的工作流程。然而,如何使这种独立于疾病的分类工具具有可操作性被认为是一个挑战,并且由算法提供的适当的患者干预措施似乎需要大量的外部和机构资源。利益相关者还描述了预测算法的信任、可信度和可解释性的重要性。

结论

尽管预测分析可以非常准确地对患者进行分类,但如果不考虑社会技术系统,精心实施这些分析将无法推进医疗服务流程和结果。关键利益相关者对成功实施的促进因素和挑战有强烈的看法。

相似文献

1
"How did you get to this number?" Stakeholder needs for implementing predictive analytics: a pre-implementation qualitative study.如何得出这个数字?实施预测分析的利益相关者需求:实施前定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):709-716. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa021.
2
Predictive analytics support for complex chronic medical conditions: An experience-based co-design study of physician managers' needs and preferences.预测分析支持复杂慢性医疗状况:基于经验的医师管理者需求和偏好的共同设计研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jul;187:105447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105447. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
3
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
4
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.门诊电子健康记录系统实施的循证管理:概念支持与定性证据评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
5
Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Patient Portal Implementation from an Organizational Perspective: Qualitative Study.从组织角度看影响患者门户网站实施的障碍与促进因素:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 11;20(5):e183. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8989.
6
Understanding barriers and facilitators to the use of Clinical Information Systems for intensive care units and Anesthesia Record Keeping: A rapid ethnography.了解重症监护病房和麻醉记录保存中临床信息系统使用的障碍与促进因素:一项快速人种志研究
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jul;84(7):500-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
8
Stakeholders barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a personalised digital care pathway: a qualitative study.利益相关者在实施个性化数字护理路径方面的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e065778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065778.
9
Facilitators and Barriers in the Implementation of a Digital Surveillance and Outbreak Response System in Ghana Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Interviews.新冠疫情之前及期间加纳数字监测与疫情应对系统实施过程中的促进因素和障碍:利益相关者访谈的定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 20;7:e45715. doi: 10.2196/45715.
10
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating end-user perspectives into the development of a machine learning algorithm for first time perinatal depression prediction.将终端用户的观点纳入用于首次围产期抑郁症预测的机器学习算法的开发过程中。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1186-1198. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf086.
2
Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.肝病学中人工智能的挑战与未来展望:突破障碍,实现更好的治疗。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102579. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102579. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
Clinician Perspectives on a Predictive Model for Recommending Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.临床医生对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗推荐预测模型的看法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1109-1118. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring Stakeholder Perceptions about Using Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Rare and Atypical Infections.探索利益相关者对使用人工智能诊断罕见和非典型感染的看法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):223-233. doi: 10.1055/a-2451-9046. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Exploring home healthcare clinicians' needs for using clinical decision support systems for early risk warning.探讨家庭医疗保健临床医生使用临床决策支持系统进行早期风险预警的需求。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2641-2650. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae247.
6
Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对精神健康护理中人工智能的看法:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 18;11:e58462. doi: 10.2196/58462.
7
Nurses' perceptions of the design, implementation, and adoption of machine learning clinical decision support: A descriptive qualitative study.护士对机器学习临床决策支持系统的设计、实施及应用的认知:一项描述性定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024 Jun 19;57(1):82-94. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13001.
8
An inaugural forum on epidemiological modeling for public health stakeholders in Arizona.亚利桑那州公共卫生利益相关者的流行病学建模首次论坛。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 31;12:1357908. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357908. eCollection 2024.
9
Physicians' and Machine Learning Researchers' Perspectives on Ethical Issues in the Early Development of Clinical Machine Learning Tools: Qualitative Interview Study.医生和机器学习研究人员对临床机器学习工具早期开发中伦理问题的看法:定性访谈研究
JMIR AI. 2023 Oct 30;2:e47449. doi: 10.2196/47449.
10
Inpatient nurses' preferences and decisions with risk information visualization.住院护士对风险信息可视化的偏好和决策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad209.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing an actionable patient taxonomy to understand and characterize high-cost Medicare patients.开发可操作的患者分类法,以了解和描述高成本医疗保险患者。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100406. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.100406. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Making Machine Learning Models Clinically Useful.让机器学习模型在临床上发挥作用。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 8;322(14):1351-1352. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10306.
3
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
4
Approach for Achieving Effective Care for High-Need Patients.为高需求患者提供有效护理的方法。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):845-846. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0823.
5
Effect of a Real-Time Electronic Dashboard on a Rapid Response System.实时电子仪表盘对快速反应系统的影响。
J Med Syst. 2017 Nov 20;42(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0858-5.
6
Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study.高成本 Medicare 亚人群中潜在可预防支出的集中程度:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 21;167(10):706-713. doi: 10.7326/M17-0767. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
7
Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index.基于机器学习的电子分诊在区分患者临床结局方面比急诊严重指数更准确。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):565-574.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses.面向住院护士的基于概率的决策支持工具的参与式设计
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx060.
9
Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients - An Urgent Priority.关爱高需求、高成本患者——一项紧迫的优先任务。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):909-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608511. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
Comparing Aging in Place to Home Health Care: Impact of Nurse Care Coordination On Utilization and Costs.比较就地养老与家庭医疗保健:护士护理协调对利用率和成本的影响。
Nurs Econ. 2015 Nov-Dec;33(6):306-13.