Suppr超能文献

超声引导下重点评估在钝性胸部创伤儿童中增强体格检查的应用。

The Utility of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Enhanced Physical Examination in Children With Blunt Torso Trauma.

机构信息

From the, Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

the, Department of Surgery, UCSF East Bay, Oakland, CA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):866-875. doi: 10.1111/acem.13959. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography (CT), the reference standard for diagnosis of intraabdominal injury (IAI), carries risk including ionizing radiation. CT-sparing clinical decision rules for children have relied heavily on physical examination, but they did not include focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), which has emerged into widespread use during the past decade. We sought to determine the independent associations of physical examination, laboratory studies, and FAST with identification of IAI in children and to compare the test characteristics of these diagnostic variables. We hypothesized that FAST may add incremental utility to a physical examination alone to more accurately identify children who could forgo CT scan.

METHODS

We reviewed a large trauma database of all children with blunt torso trauma presenting to a freestanding pediatric emergency department during a 20-month period. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association of FAST, physical examination, and selected laboratory data with IAI in children, and we compared the test characteristics of these variables.

RESULTS

Among 354 children, 50 (14%) had IAI. Positive FAST (odds ratio [OR] = 14.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.5 to 30.8) and positive physical examination (OR = 15.2, 95% CI = 7.7 to 31.7) were identified as independent predictors for IAI. Physical examination and FAST each had sensitivities of 74% (95% CI = 60% to 85%). Combining FAST and physical examination as FAST-enhanced physical examination (exFAST) improved sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) over either test alone (sensitivity = 88%, 95% CI = 76% to 96%) and NPV of 97.3% (95% CI = 94.5% to 98.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

In children, FAST and physical examinations each predicted the identification of IAI. However, the combination of the two (exFAST) had greater sensitivity and NPV than either physical examination or FAST alone. This supports the use of exFAST in refining clinical predication rules in children with blunt torso trauma.

摘要

目的

计算机断层扫描(CT)是诊断腹部损伤(IAI)的标准方法,但存在电离辐射风险。儿童的 CT 节约型临床决策规则主要依赖于体格检查,但没有包括在过去十年中广泛应用的创伤重点超声评估(FAST)。我们旨在确定体格检查、实验室研究和 FAST 与儿童 IAI 识别的独立关联,并比较这些诊断变量的测试特征。我们假设 FAST 可能会增加体格检查的额外效用,从而更准确地识别可以避免 CT 扫描的儿童。

方法

我们回顾了 20 个月期间在一家独立儿科急诊部就诊的所有钝性躯干创伤儿童的大型创伤数据库。我们使用逻辑回归评估 FAST、体格检查和选定的实验室数据与儿童 IAI 的关联,并比较了这些变量的测试特征。

结果

在 354 名儿童中,50 名(14%)有 IAI。阳性 FAST(优势比[OR] = 14.8,95%置信区间[CI] = 7.5 至 30.8)和阳性体格检查(OR = 15.2,95%CI = 7.7 至 31.7)被确定为 IAI 的独立预测因素。体格检查和 FAST 的敏感性均为 74%(95%CI = 60%至 85%)。将 FAST 和体格检查结合起来作为增强型 FAST(exFAST),比单独使用任何一种检查方法都能提高敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)(敏感性 = 88%,95%CI = 76%至 96%)和 NPV 为 97.3%(95%CI = 94.5%至 98.7%)。

结论

在儿童中,FAST 和体格检查都预测了 IAI 的发生。然而,两者的组合(exFAST)比单独使用体格检查或 FAST 具有更高的敏感性和 NPV。这支持在儿童钝性躯干创伤中使用 exFAST 来完善临床预测规则。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验