• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 PECARN 临床决策规则与临床医生怀疑度在预测急诊科钝性躯干创伤儿童腹腔内损伤中的作用。

Comparison of PECARN clinical decision rule and clinician suspicion in predicting intra-abdominal injury in children with blunt torso trauma in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Gebze Fatih State Hospital, Kocaeli-Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Apr;28(4):529-536. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.40156.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2020.40156
PMID:35485505
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10521006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) developed a clinical decision rule to identify children at low risk for intra-abdominal injury requiring acute intervention (IAI-I) for reducing unnecessary radiation exposure of ab-dominal computed tomography (CT) after blunt torso trauma. This study aimed to compare the PECARN decision rule with clinician suspicion in identifying children at low risk of intra-abdominal injuries that an abdominal CT scan can be safely avoided.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of children with blunt torso trauma in an academic emergency department (ED) between 2011 and 2019. Patients were considered positive for the PECARN rule if they exhibited any of the variables. Clinician suspi-cion was defined as actual CT ordering of the treating physician. The primary outcome was IAI-I detected by imaging or surgery within 1 month after the trauma, and the secondary outcome was any intra-abdominal injury (IAI) presence.

RESULTS

Among the 768 children included, 48 (6.25%) had intra-abdominal injuries and 21 (2.73%) of whom underwent acute in-tervention. Four hundred and fifty-three (59%) children underwent abdominal CT scanning. If the PECARN rule had been applied, 232 patients would have undergone abdominal CT. The rule revealed 90.48% (95% CI=68.17-98.33%) sensitivity for IAI-I and 81.25% (95% CI=66.9-90.56%) for IAI. Clinician suspicion revealed sensitivities of 100% (95% CI=80.76-00%) and 93.75% (95% CI=81.79-98.37%) for IAI-I and IAI, respectively. Sensitivities of the rule and clinician suspicion were statistically similar for both IAI-I (p=0.5) and IAI (p=0.146).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the PECARN abdominal rule and clinician suspicion performed similarly in identifying intra-abdominal injuries in children with blunt torso trauma. However, our study supports the use of PECARN abdominal rule in addition to clinical judgment to limit unnecessary abdominal CT use in pediatric patients with blunt torso trauma in the ED.

摘要

背景

儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)制定了一个临床决策规则,以识别出需要进行急性干预(IAI-I)的低风险腹腔内损伤的儿童,从而减少钝性胸部创伤后腹部 CT 检查的不必要辐射暴露。本研究旨在比较 PECARN 决策规则与临床医生的怀疑,以识别出可以安全避免腹部 CT 扫描的腹腔内损伤风险较低的儿童。

方法

这是一项对 2011 年至 2019 年在学术急诊部门(ED)接受钝性胸部创伤的儿童进行的回顾性研究。如果患儿出现任何变量,则被认为是 PECARN 规则阳性。临床医生的怀疑是指主治医生实际进行 CT 检查。主要结局是创伤后 1 个月内通过影像学或手术发现 IAI-I,次要结局是存在任何腹腔内损伤(IAI)。

结果

在纳入的 768 名儿童中,48 名(6.25%)有腹腔内损伤,其中 21 名(2.73%)接受了急性干预。453 名(59%)儿童接受了腹部 CT 扫描。如果应用 PECARN 规则,232 名患儿将进行腹部 CT 检查。该规则对 IAI-I 的敏感性为 90.48%(95%CI=68.17-98.33%),对 IAI 的敏感性为 81.25%(95%CI=66.9-90.56%)。临床医生的怀疑对 IAI-I 和 IAI 的敏感性分别为 100%(95%CI=80.76-00%)和 93.75%(95%CI=81.79-98.37%)。规则和临床医生怀疑的敏感性在 IAI-I(p=0.5)和 IAI(p=0.146)方面均无统计学差异。

结论

在这项研究中,PECARN 腹部规则和临床医生的怀疑在识别钝性胸部创伤儿童的腹腔内损伤方面表现相似。然而,我们的研究支持在 ED 中对钝性胸部创伤的儿科患者使用 PECARN 腹部规则和临床判断,以限制不必要的腹部 CT 使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc4/10521006/e8874592319a/TJTES-28-529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc4/10521006/e8874592319a/TJTES-28-529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc4/10521006/e8874592319a/TJTES-28-529-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of PECARN clinical decision rule and clinician suspicion in predicting intra-abdominal injury in children with blunt torso trauma in the emergency department.比较 PECARN 临床决策规则与临床医生怀疑度在预测急诊科钝性躯干创伤儿童腹腔内损伤中的作用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Apr;28(4):529-536. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.40156.
2
Comparison of Clinician Suspicion Versus a Clinical Prediction Rule in Identifying Children at Risk for Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Torso Trauma.钝性躯干创伤后识别有腹腔内损伤风险儿童时临床医生的怀疑与临床预测规则的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1034-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12739. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
3
Imaging for Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma With Different Prediction Rules: Is the Outcome the Same?不同预测规则在儿科钝性腹部创伤中的影像学应用:结果是否相同?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e654-e658. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002346.
4
PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.PECARN 预测规则在儿童因钝器伤就诊于急诊时的颈椎成像:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul;8(7):482-490. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00104-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
PECARN prediction rules for CT imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma: a multicentre prospective validation study.PECARN 预测规则在急诊以钝性腹部或轻微头部创伤就诊的儿童 CT 成像中的应用:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 May;8(5):339-347. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00029-4.
6
Evaluation for intra-abdominal injury in children after blunt torso trauma: can we reduce unnecessary abdominal computed tomography by utilizing a clinical prediction model?儿童钝性躯干创伤后腹部损伤的评估:我们能否通过利用临床预测模型减少不必要的腹部计算机断层扫描?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):371-6; discussion 376. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825840ab.
7
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
External validation of a five-variable clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury after blunt abdominal trauma.经腹部钝伤后,用于识别极低风险腹腔内脏器损伤患儿的五变量临床预测规则的外部验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):71-77. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001933.
9
Validation of a prediction rule for the identification of children with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt torso trauma.用于识别钝性躯干创伤后腹腔内损伤儿童的预测规则的验证
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
10
Identifying Children at Very Low Risk for Blunt Intra-Abdominal Injury in Whom CT of the Abdomen Can Be Avoided Safely.识别钝性腹部损伤极低风险的儿童,对这些儿童可安全避免进行腹部CT检查。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):449-458.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.041. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in computed tomography utilization for pediatric blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pediatric and non-pediatric trauma centers.儿童钝器伤 CT 利用率的差异:比较儿科和非儿科创伤中心的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):743-764. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02172-3. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
2
Validation of Prediction Rules for Computed Tomography Use in Children With Blunt Abdominal or Blunt Head Trauma: Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.钝性腹部或钝性头部创伤儿童计算机断层扫描使用预测规则的验证:一项前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):e43027. doi: 10.2196/43027.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging for Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma With Different Prediction Rules: Is the Outcome the Same?不同预测规则在儿科钝性腹部创伤中的影像学应用:结果是否相同?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e654-e658. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002346.
2
External validation of a clinical prediction rule for very low risk pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.临床预测规则对极低风险儿科钝性腹部创伤的外部验证。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1643-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
Accuracy of Clinician Practice Compared With Three Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.
临床医生实践与三种头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
4
Injured Children Receive Twice the Radiation Dose at Nonpediatric Trauma Centers Compared With Pediatric Trauma Centers.与儿科创伤中心相比,受伤儿童在非儿科创伤中心接受的辐射剂量是其两倍。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Jan;15(1 Pt A):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
5
Effect of Abdominal Ultrasound on Clinical Care, Outcomes, and Resource Use Among Children With Blunt Torso Trauma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹部超声对钝性躯干创伤儿童临床护理、结局及资源利用的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jun 13;317(22):2290-2296. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6322.
6
Identifying Children at Very Low Risk for Blunt Intra-Abdominal Injury in Whom CT of the Abdomen Can Be Avoided Safely.识别钝性腹部损伤极低风险的儿童,对这些儿童可安全避免进行腹部CT检查。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):449-458.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.041. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Hot Off the Press: Comparison of Clinical Suspicion Versus a Clinical Prediction Rule When Evaluating Children Following Blunt Torso Trauma.最新消息:钝性躯干创伤后评估儿童时临床怀疑与临床预测规则的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;23(1):110-2. doi: 10.1111/acem.12851. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
8
Comparison of Clinician Suspicion Versus a Clinical Prediction Rule in Identifying Children at Risk for Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Torso Trauma.钝性躯干创伤后识别有腹腔内损伤风险儿童时临床医生的怀疑与临床预测规则的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1034-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12739. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
Variation in Computed Tomography Imaging for Pediatric Injury-Related Emergency Visits.儿科损伤相关急诊就诊的计算机断层扫描成像差异。
J Pediatr. 2015 Oct;167(4):897-904.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.052. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
When is it safe to forgo abdominal CT in blunt-injured children?对于钝性损伤的儿童,何时可以不进行腹部CT检查才安全?
Surgery. 2015 Aug;158(2):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 May 18.