Massad P M, Bobbitt R G, Kelly M P, Beasley T M
Veterans Administration Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Nov;44(6):924-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<924::aid-jclp2270440612>3.0.co;2-9.
Effects of lateralized brain damage on the Satz-Mogel (1962) WAIS-R short form were examined. Patients (N = 65) were assigned to groups based on diffuse, predominantly left, or predominantly right brain damage. Overall, results supported the validity of the Satz-Mogel short-form IQs with neurological patients, although there were significant ANOVA results for various subtests when original scores were compared to short-form scores. A comparison of groups in regard to the number of deviations (i.e., +/- 3) from original WAIS-R subtests raised questions with regard to the effects of lesion laterality on certain short-form subtest scores. Criteria for evaluating short forms and issues for further research are discussed.
研究了大脑单侧损伤对Satz-Mogel(1962)韦氏成人智力量表修订版简式的影响。根据弥漫性、主要为左侧或主要为右侧脑损伤将患者(N = 65)分组。总体而言,结果支持Satz-Mogel简式智商对神经科患者的有效性,尽管将原始分数与简式分数进行比较时,各个子测验的方差分析结果存在显著差异。就韦氏成人智力量表修订版原始子测验的偏差数量(即±3)对各组进行比较,引发了关于损伤侧别对某些简式子测验分数影响的问题。讨论了评估简式的标准以及进一步研究的问题。