Mattis P J, Hannay H J, Plenger P M, Pollock L
Dept. of Psychology, University of Houston, TX 77204-5341.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):605-14. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<605::aid-jclp2270500418>3.0.co;2-v.
The current study investigated the efficacy of a Satz-Mogel type short form of the WAIS-R in a closed head injury (CHI) population and whether the short form's effectiveness varied by lesion site. Data were taken from the files of 79 CHI patients, 20 with left hemisphere damage, 15 with right hemisphere damage, 29 with bilateral damage, and 15 with only diffuse damage. Information about IQ scores and age-corrected subtest scores was examined. As expected, correlations between two forms, for both IQ scores and subtest scores were high. However, there was a remarkable percentage of deviation in scaled score points and changes in intellectual classification for some of these scores. No evidence was found to support the notion that usefulness of the short form varied according to the location of lesion.
本研究调查了韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)的Satz-Mogel式简版在闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)人群中的有效性,以及该简版的有效性是否因损伤部位而异。数据取自79名CHI患者的档案,其中20名患者左半球受损,15名患者右半球受损,29名患者双侧受损,15名患者仅存在弥漫性损伤。对智商分数和年龄校正后的分测验分数信息进行了检查。正如预期的那样,两种形式之间在智商分数和分测验分数上的相关性都很高。然而,对于其中一些分数,量表分数点存在显著的偏差百分比,智力分类也有变化。没有证据支持简版的有用性因损伤部位而异的观点。