Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Applied Physiology & Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Educaton and Sport, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;41(8):512-519. doi: 10.1055/a-1114-6297. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
To analyze whether heart rate variability is reproducible after maximal exercise, 11 men (22.1±3.2 years) performed four incremental exercise tests followed by passive or active recovery. There was high reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation: 0.72-0.96) and fair-to-excellent agreement (coefficient of variation: 7.81-22.09%) in passive recovery, as well as moderate-to-high reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation: 0.50-0.87) and good agreement (coefficient of variation: 11.08-20.89%) in active recovery for LnRMSSD index. There was moderate-to-high reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation: 0.51-0.81) and good agreement (coefficient of variation: 10.41-18.87%) in most of the analyzed time points, in both recovery types for LnSDNN. In both types of recovery, the time domain heart rate variability 5-10 min indices (passive: intraclass coefficient correlation : 0.87-0.88; coefficient of variation: 7.67-13.44%; active: intraclass coefficient correlation 0.59-0.80; coefficient of variation: 14.62-16.26%) presented higher intraclass coefficient correlation and lower coefficient of variation than the spectral heart rate variability indices (passive: intraclass coefficient correlation: 0.71-0.87; coefficient of variation: 12.33-34.21%; active: intraclass coefficient correlation: 0.46-0.77; coefficient of variation: 24.41-105.12%). The LnRMSSD and LnSDNN indices analyzed in 30 s segments and the heart rate variability 5-10 min indices after maximal exercise in untrained healthy men showed satisfactory reproducibility, regardless of the type of recovery, with the time-domain indices showing higher reproducibility than the frequency-domain indices.
为了分析最大运动后心率变异性是否具有可重复性,11 名男性(22.1±3.2 岁)进行了四次递增运动测试,随后进行被动或主动恢复。在被动恢复中,LnRMSSD 指数具有高可靠性(组内相关系数相关性:0.72-0.96)和良好到极好的一致性(变异系数:7.81-22.09%),而在主动恢复中,该指数具有中度到高度可靠性(组内相关系数相关性:0.50-0.87)和良好的一致性(变异系数:11.08-20.89%)。在两种恢复类型中,LnSDNN 的大多数分析时间点都具有中度到高度可靠性(组内相关系数相关性:0.51-0.81)和良好的一致性(变异系数:10.41-18.87%)。在两种恢复类型中,5-10 分钟的时域心率变异性指数(被动:组内相关系数相关性:0.87-0.88;变异系数:7.67-13.44%;主动:组内相关系数相关性 0.59-0.80;变异系数:14.62-16.26%)的组内相关系数更高,变异系数更低,而频域心率变异性指数(被动:组内相关系数相关性:0.71-0.87;变异系数:12.33-34.21%;主动:组内相关系数相关性:0.46-0.77;变异系数:24.41-105.12%)则相反。在未经训练的健康男性中,30 秒段的 LnRMSSD 和 LnSDNN 指数以及最大运动后 5-10 分钟的心率变异性指数表现出令人满意的可重复性,无论恢复类型如何,时域指数的可重复性都高于频域指数。