Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs, Chief Directorate Veterinary Services, Veterinary Public Health, Private Bag X11309, Mbombela 1200, South Africa - University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa - One Health Center for Zoonoses and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 334, St Kitts, Basseterre, West Indies.
Parasite. 2020;27:13. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020010. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Knowledge on the epidemiology, host range and transmission of Trichinella spp. infections in different ecological zones in southern Africa including areas of wildlife-human interface is limited. The majority of reports on Trichinella infections in sub-Saharan Africa were from wildlife resident in protected areas. Elucidation of the epidemiology of the infections and the prediction of hosts involved in the sylvatic cycles within specific ecological niches is critical. Of recent, there have been reports of Trichinella infections in several wildlife species within the Greater Kruger National Park (GKNP) of South Africa, which has prompted the revision and update of published hypothetical transmission cycles including the hypothetical options based previously on the biology and feeding behaviour of wildlife hosts confined to the GKNP. Using data gathered from surveillance studies and reports spanning the period 1964-2019, confirmed transmission cycles and revised hypothesized transmission cycles of three known Trichinella species (T. zimbabwensis, Trichinella T8 and T. nelsoni) are presented. These were formulated based on the epidemiological factors, feeding habits of hosts and prevalence data gathered from the GKNP. We presume that the formulated sylvatic cycles may be extrapolated to similar national parks and wildlife protected areas in sub-Saharan Africa where the same host and parasite species are known to occur. The anecdotal nature of some of the presented data confirms the need for more intense epidemiological surveillance in national parks and wildlife protected areas in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa to unravel the epidemiology of Trichinella infections in these unique and diverse protected landscapes.
关于南部非洲不同生态区(包括野生动植物与人接触区)旋毛虫病的流行病学、宿主范围和传播的知识有限。撒哈拉以南非洲关于旋毛虫感染的大多数报告都来自保护区内的野生动物。阐明感染的流行病学以及预测特定生态小生境中涉及的野生动物宿主的循环,是至关重要的。最近,南非大克鲁格国家公园(GKNP)内的几种野生动物物种报告了旋毛虫感染,这促使修订和更新了已发表的假设传播循环,包括以前基于 GKNP 内野生动物宿主的生物学和摄食行为的假设选择。利用 1964 年至 2019 年期间收集的监测研究和报告数据,提出了三种已知旋毛虫(T. zimbabwensis、 Trichinella T8 和 T. nelsoni)的确认传播循环和修订假设传播循环。这些是根据流行病学因素、宿主的摄食习惯和从 GKNP 收集的流行数据制定的。我们推测,制定的森林循环可以外推到撒哈拉以南非洲的类似国家公园和野生动物保护区,在这些地区已知存在相同的宿主和寄生虫物种。所提出的数据的轶事性质证实,需要在撒哈拉以南非洲的其他国家公园和野生动物保护区进行更密集的流行病学监测,以揭示这些独特和多样的保护区景观中的旋毛虫感染的流行病学。