• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助全髋关节置换术后股骨前倾角、股骨偏心距和垂直偏心距的误差。

Errors in femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and vertical offset following robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2104. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2104
PMID:32163669
Abstract

The objectives were to determine errors in femoral anteversion (FA), femoral offset (FO), and vertical offset (VO) with robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and how consistently these errors are within clinically desirable limits of ±5° and ±5 mm. After preoperative planning, robot-assisted THAs were performed on twelve cadaveric specimens. The error between achieved and planned component placements was used to determine bias (mean error) and precision (SD of error). The percent of the population within clinically desirable limits was determined. Bias of 1.5° and 2.7 mm occurred for FA and VO, respectively. Precision was 1.2° for FA and better than 1.5 mm for FO and VO. The percent of population within clinically desirable limits was at least 95% for FA and at least 99% for FO. With limits of ±7 mm, at least 95% of the population was within these limits for VO. Robot-assisted THA may improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的是确定机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)中股骨前倾角(FA)、股骨偏心距(FO)和垂直偏心距(VO)的误差,以及这些误差在临床可接受的±5°和±5mm 范围内的一致性。在术前规划后,对 12 具尸体标本进行了机器人辅助 THA。使用实际组件位置与计划组件位置之间的误差来确定偏差(平均误差)和精度(误差的标准差)。确定了在临床可接受范围内的人群比例。FA 和 VO 的偏差分别为 1.5°和 2.7mm。FA 的精度为 1.2°,FO 和 VO 的精度优于 1.5mm。FA 的人群比例至少为 95%,FO 的人群比例至少为 99%。在±7mm 的限制下,VO 的至少 95%的人群在这些限制内。机器人辅助 THA 可能改善临床结果。

相似文献

1
Errors in femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and vertical offset following robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术后股骨前倾角、股骨偏心距和垂直偏心距的误差。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2104. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
What are the six degree-of-freedom errors of a robotically-machined femoral cavity in total hip arthroplasty and are they clinically important? An in-vitro study.全髋关节置换术中机器人加工的股骨腔的六个自由度误差是什么,它们在临床上重要吗?一项体外研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Oct;48:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
3
Femoral anteversion change is associated with ischiofemoral impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective CT evaluation.股骨前倾角改变与全髋关节置换术后坐骨股骨撞击有关:一项回顾性 CT 评估。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3529-3537. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10428-2. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty better restore native acetabular and femoral anatomy?触觉机器人辅助全髋关节置换术能否更好地恢复髋臼和股骨的自然解剖结构?
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Jun;12(2):288-95. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1663. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.下肢对线与股骨近端解剖的关系。全髋关节置换术中的参数。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Sep;99(5):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
6
Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后颈干角和股骨假体前倾角的改变对临床疗效有影响吗?
Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1615-22. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.34654.
7
[Comparison of hip offset and rotation center reconstruction between robot-assisted and manual total hip arthroplasty].机器人辅助与人工全髋关节置换术中髋臼偏心距和旋转中心重建的比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 4;102(1):36-42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210804-01737.
8
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:一项使用多参数定量三维CT评估对线的对照尸体研究。
Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.
9
Precision and accuracy of robot-assisted technology with simplified express femoral workflow in measuring leg length and offset in total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助技术简化快速股骨流程在全髋关节置换术中测量腿长和下肢偏移的精确性和准确性。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Oct;16(5):1-6. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2141. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Plain radiographs fail to reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty.普通 X 光片无法反映全髋关节置换术中的股骨偏心距。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1661-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Patient-Specific (PS) Femoral Osteotomy Guide: A Computed Tomography (CT) Study.三维(3D)打印的患者特异性(PS)股骨截骨术导板的准确性:一项计算机断层扫描(CT)研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;9(11):667. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110667.
2
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.翻修伴有严重髋臼缺陷的全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助技术的初步探索和尝试。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1912-1917. doi: 10.1111/os.13368. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
Can Lateral Offset Be Used as a Predictive Marker for Proximal Femur Disorders?
股骨近端偏移能否用作股骨近端疾病的预测指标?
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Nov 28;56(4):614-620. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00576-2. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Current concepts in robotic total hip arthroplasty.机器人全髋关节置换术的当前概念
SICOT J. 2020;6:45. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020041. Epub 2020 Nov 27.