• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术中机器人加工的股骨腔的六个自由度误差是什么,它们在临床上重要吗?一项体外研究。

What are the six degree-of-freedom errors of a robotically-machined femoral cavity in total hip arthroplasty and are they clinically important? An in-vitro study.

作者信息

Hsieh Chih Ming, Howell Stephen M, Hull Maury L

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Med Eng Phys. 2017 Oct;48:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.016
PMID:28754368
Abstract

Errors during a robot-assisted THA may result in a femoral cavity with position and orientation different than planned. This can lead to a femoral component placement that inaccurately sets a patient's femoral anteversion (FA), femoral offset (FO), and vertical offset (VO). The objectives of this study were to determine the position and orientation errors of robotically-machined femoral cavities in six degrees of freedom and to determine how position and orientation errors translate into errors in the setting of FA, FO, and VO. After creating preoperative plans, robot-assisted THAs were performed on twelve cadaveric specimens. The position and orientation of the machined cavities were compared to those of the planned cavities to determine the errors in six degrees of freedom. Placement of femoral components into the machined cavities was simulated, and the differences in FA, FO, and VO between the simulated and planned component placement were computed. While bias (i.e. mean error) occurred for three of six degrees of freedom in femoral cavities machined by a robotic system, the root mean squared errors (RMSEs) when the placement of femoral component was simulated were limited to 1.9° for FA, 1.0mm for FO, and 2.1mm for VO and were clinically unimportant.

摘要

机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中的误差可能导致股骨腔的位置和方向与计划不同。这可能会导致股骨假体的放置不准确地设定患者的股骨前倾角(FA)、股骨偏心距(FO)和垂直偏心距(VO)。本研究的目的是确定机器人加工的股骨腔在六个自由度上的位置和方向误差,并确定位置和方向误差如何转化为FA、FO和VO设定中的误差。在制定术前计划后,对12个尸体标本进行了机器人辅助全髋关节置换术。将加工腔的位置和方向与计划腔的位置和方向进行比较,以确定六个自由度上的误差。模拟了股骨假体在加工腔中的放置,并计算了模拟和计划假体放置之间FA、FO和VO的差异。虽然机器人系统加工的股骨腔在六个自由度中的三个出现了偏差(即平均误差),但模拟股骨假体放置时的均方根误差(RMSE)在FA方面限制为1.9°,在FO方面限制为1.0mm,在VO方面限制为2.1mm,在临床上并不重要。

相似文献

1
What are the six degree-of-freedom errors of a robotically-machined femoral cavity in total hip arthroplasty and are they clinically important? An in-vitro study.全髋关节置换术中机器人加工的股骨腔的六个自由度误差是什么,它们在临床上重要吗?一项体外研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Oct;48:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Errors in femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and vertical offset following robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术后股骨前倾角、股骨偏心距和垂直偏心距的误差。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2104. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.全髋关节置换术中的触觉引导机器人技术:一项尸体研究
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Mar;227(3):302-9. doi: 10.1177/0954411912468540.
4
Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.下肢对线与股骨近端解剖的关系。全髋关节置换术中的参数。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Sep;99(5):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
5
Plain radiographs fail to reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty.普通 X 光片无法反映全髋关节置换术中的股骨偏心距。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1661-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
6
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:一项使用多参数定量三维CT评估对线的对照尸体研究。
Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.
7
Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.全髋关节置换术中短干骺端适配柄植入的手动锉削与机器人铣削比较:一项尸体研究
Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18(1-2):33-40. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.744430. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
Ultrasound-based computer navigation: an accurate measurement tool for determining combined anteversion?基于超声的计算机导航:一种用于确定联合前倾的精确测量工具?
Technol Health Care. 2012;20(6):535-43. doi: 10.3233/THC-2012-00699.
9
Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.原发性骨关节炎全髋关节置换术中采用推荐的安全组件方向与固有解剖结构的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01014.
10
Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty better restore native acetabular and femoral anatomy?触觉机器人辅助全髋关节置换术能否更好地恢复髋臼和股骨的自然解剖结构?
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Jun;12(2):288-95. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1663. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Implant placement accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: validation of a CT-based measurement technique.全膝关节置换术中植入物放置的准确性:基于CT测量技术的验证
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Feb;10(2):475-484. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.01.02.