Sternisko Anni, Cichocka Aleksandra, Van Bavel Jay J
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
School of Psychology, University of Kent, CT2 7NZ Canterbury, UK; Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Social change does not always equal social progress-there is a dark side of social movements. We discuss conspiracy theory beliefs - beliefs that a powerful group of people are secretly working towards a malicious goal - as one contributor to destructive social movements. Research has linked conspiracy theory beliefs to anti-democratic attitudes, prejudice and non-normative political behavior. We propose a framework to understand the motivational processes behind conspiracy theories and associated social identities and collective action. We argue that conspiracy theories comprise at least two components - content and qualities-that appeal to people differently based on their motivations. Social identity motives draw people foremost to contents of conspiracy theories while uniqueness motives draw people to qualities of conspiracy theories.
社会变革并不总是等同于社会进步——社会运动存在阴暗面。我们将阴谋论信念——即认为有一群有权势的人正在秘密朝着恶意目标努力的信念——视为破坏性社会运动的一个促成因素。研究已将阴谋论信念与反民主态度、偏见和非规范性政治行为联系起来。我们提出一个框架来理解阴谋论背后的动机过程以及相关的社会身份和集体行动。我们认为,阴谋论至少包含两个要素——内容和特质——它们根据人们的动机以不同方式吸引人们。社会身份动机首先将人们吸引到阴谋论的内容上,而独特性动机则将人们吸引到阴谋论的特质上。