• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种淋巴结分类方法对肝门部胆管癌生存预测的评估。

Evaluation of Four Lymph Node Classifications for the Prediction of Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.

Department of Clinical Center of Oncology, Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May;26(5):1030-1040. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05211-x. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-021-05211-x
PMID:34973138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9085675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important prognostic indicator of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) in patients after surgery is metastasis of lymph nodes (LN). However, there are many types of LN staging systems to the issue of a better determination of the prognosis of patients through the lymphatic staging system which needs research. Based on the above, we tried to re-evaluate the staging system of HCCA LNs. We compared the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), number of metastatic LNs (MLN), ratio of LN (LNR), and log odds of MLNs (LODDS) in individuals undergoing curative resection to determine the best LN staging system.

METHODS

In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed 229 patients undergoing curative resection. We evaluated the impact of the stage of AJCC pN, LNR, LODDS, and MLN on OS (overall survival) and RFS (recurrence-free survival). According to the curve of receiver operating characteristic (ROC), we compared the predictive capacity of different staging systems of LN for survival and recurrence.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis results revealed that LODDS >  - 0.45 (95% CI = 1.115-2.709, P = 0.015; 95% CI = 1.187-2.780, P = 0.006) are independent risk factors affecting OS and RFS, respectively. Compared with LN status, AJCC pN stage, MLN, and LNR, the variable having the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was LODDS when predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that metastasis of LNs is a key indicator for predicting patient death and recurrence. Among them, LODDS is the best LN staging system for the prognostic evaluation of HCCA patients after surgery. Clinicians can incorporate LODDS into HCCA patient lymphatic staging system for a more accurate prognosis of HCCA patients post-surgery.

摘要

背景

在接受手术的肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)患者中,淋巴结转移(LN)是一个重要的预后指标。然而,存在许多类型的 LN 分期系统,需要通过淋巴分期系统更好地确定患者的预后。基于上述情况,我们试图重新评估 HCCA LN 的分期系统。我们比较了美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)、转移的 LN 数量(MLN)、LN 比率(LNR)和对数优势比的 MLN(LODDS)在接受根治性切除的个体中的表现,以确定最佳的 LN 分期系统。

方法

在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了 229 例接受根治性切除的患者。我们评估了 AJCC pN 分期、LNR、LODDS 和 MLN 分期对 OS(总生存)和 RFS(无复发生存)的影响。根据接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,我们比较了不同 LN 分期系统对生存和复发的预测能力。

结果

多变量分析结果显示,LODDS > -0.45(95%CI = 1.115-2.709,P = 0.015;95%CI = 1.187-2.780,P = 0.006)是影响 OS 和 RFS 的独立危险因素。与 LN 状态、AJCC pN 分期、MLN 和 LNR 相比,在预测 1 年、3 年和 5 年 OS 和 RFS 时,ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)最高的变量是 LODDS。

结论

本研究表明,LN 转移是预测患者死亡和复发的关键指标。其中,LODDS 是预测 HCCA 患者术后生存和复发的最佳 LN 分期系统。临床医生可以将 LODDS 纳入 HCCA 患者的淋巴分期系统,以更准确地预测 HCCA 患者术后的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/9085675/c7f20ca20cbc/11605_2021_5211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/9085675/40dbd8130107/11605_2021_5211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/9085675/c7f20ca20cbc/11605_2021_5211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/9085675/40dbd8130107/11605_2021_5211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/9085675/c7f20ca20cbc/11605_2021_5211_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Four Lymph Node Classifications for the Prediction of Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.四种淋巴结分类方法对肝门部胆管癌生存预测的评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May;26(5):1030-1040. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05211-x. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
2
What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.肝门周围胆管癌最准确的淋巴结分期方法是什么?UICC/AJCC pN分期、转移淋巴结数量、淋巴结比率及转移淋巴结对数几率的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
3
Association of Lymph Node Status With Survival in Patients After Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian Multicenter Analysis.意大利多中心分析:肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后淋巴结状态与生存的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):916-922. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1769.
4
The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.不同淋巴结分期系统对胃腺癌手术后淋巴结≤15枚患者的预后价值。
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Feb;118(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1346036. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining an Optimal Prognostic Lymph Node Stratification Schema.肝内胆管癌的外科治疗:定义一种最佳的预后性淋巴结分层方案。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2772-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4419-1. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
[The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].[淋巴结转移指数与胰腺癌患者R0切除术后预后的关系]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):474-479. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191125-00760.
7
Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.三种不同淋巴结分期系统对胃癌患者D2淋巴结清扫术后生存的预后价值
Tumour Biol. 2016 Aug;37(8):11105-13. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4191-7. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment.根治性切除联合辅助治疗后壶腹腺癌患者淋巴结状态的预后相关性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Surgical management of periampullary adenocarcinoma: defining an optimal prognostic lymph node stratification schema.壶腹周围腺癌的外科治疗:确定最佳预后淋巴结分层方案。
J Cancer. 2018 Apr 18;9(9):1667-1679. doi: 10.7150/jca.24109. eCollection 2018.
10
Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.胆囊癌患者淋巴结状态的预后意义:一项多机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):3016-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5243-y. Epub 2016 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术切除肝门部胆管癌的短期和长期预后:一项基于倾向评分的分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Apr 1;14(2):207-221. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-680. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Predictive model for very early recurrence of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a machine learning approach.肝门部胆管癌患者极早期复发的预测模型:一种机器学习方法
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Feb 1;14(1):3-15. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-385. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版肝胆管癌分期系统对肝门周围胆管癌的预后预测:与第 7 版相比,改善有限。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):886-895. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.新版美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期手册第 8 版评估肝门周围胆管癌。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1612-1618. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04127-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
淋巴结比率在肝内和肝外胆管癌中的预后意义
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 11;17(2):220. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020220.
4
Development and validation of a novel preoperative clinical model for predicting lymph node metastasis in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.开发和验证一种新的术前临床模型,用于预测肝门周围胆管癌的淋巴结转移。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12068-1.
5
Development of a model based on the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index to predict survival for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.基于年龄调整后的Charlson合并症指数建立模型以预测肝门部胆管癌切除术后生存率
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):1036-1050. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i6.1036.
6
Assessment of the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients following curative resection: .评估根治性切除术后肝门周围胆管癌患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值的预后价值:
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;12:1104810. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1104810. eCollection 2022.
7
Survival analysis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的肝外胆管癌生存分析
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023 May 31;27(2):151-157. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-090. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
8
Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on long-term survival in patients with different stages of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated with curative resection: .围手术期输血对接受根治性切除的不同分期肝门部胆管癌患者长期生存的影响:
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;12:1059581. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1059581. eCollection 2022.
9
Influencing factors of biliary fistula after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a prospect cohort.肝门部胆管癌根治术后胆瘘的影响因素:前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Oct 28;27(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00851-4.
10
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study.预测肝门部胆管癌根治性切除术后无复发生存的预后模型的开发与验证:一项多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:849053. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849053. eCollection 2022.
Cancer statistics, 2019.
癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Eighth Edition of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-What has changed and why?第八版 UICC 恶性肿瘤分类:病理 TNM 分类标准变化概述——有哪些变化,为什么?
Virchows Arch. 2018 Apr;472(4):519-531. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2276-y. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment.根治性切除联合辅助治疗后壶腹腺癌患者淋巴结状态的预后相关性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Can preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 levels predict survival and early recurrence in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma?术前和术后CA19-9水平能否预测可切除肝门部胆管癌患者的生存及早期复发情况?
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):45335-45344. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17336.
7
What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.肝门周围胆管癌最准确的淋巴结分期方法是什么?UICC/AJCC pN分期、转移淋巴结数量、淋巴结比率及转移淋巴结对数几率的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
8
A new classification of lymph node metastases according to the lymph node stations for predicting prognosis in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.一种根据淋巴结分站对食管鳞状细胞癌手术患者进行淋巴结转移分类以预测预后的新方法。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 15;7(46):76261-76273. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12842.
9
Comparison of three lymph node classifications for survival prediction in distant metastatic gastric cancer.三种淋巴结分类方法在预测远处转移性胃癌生存中的比较。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.096. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.肝门部胆管癌:检查的淋巴结数量及最佳淋巴结预后方案
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):750-759.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 26.