• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阳性淋巴结和切缘状态对切除的肝门部胆管癌患者总生存的影响:ENSCCA注册研究

Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry.

作者信息

Nooijen Lynn E, Banales Jesus M, de Boer Marieke T, Braconi Chiara, Folseraas Trine, Forner Alejandro, Holowko Waclaw, Hoogwater Frederik J H, Klümpen Heinz-Josef, Groot Koerkamp Bas, Lamarca Angela, La Casta Adelaida, López-López Flora, Izquierdo-Sánchez Laura, Scheiter Alexander, Utpatel Kirsten, Swijnenburg Rutger-Jan, Kazemier Geert, Erdmann Joris I

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 12;14(10):2389. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102389.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14102389
PMID:35625993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9140174/
Abstract

Background: Lymph node metastasis and positive resection margins have been reported to be major determinants of overall survival (OS) and poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the prognostic value of positive lymph nodes independently from resection margin status on OS has not been evaluated. Methods: From the European Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA) registry, patients who underwent resection for pCCA between 1994 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was OS stratified for resection margin and lymph node status. The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Results: A total of 325 patients from 11 different centers and six European countries were included. Of these, 194 (59.7%) patients had negative resection margins. In 113 (34.8%) patients, positive lymph nodes were found. Lymph node status, histological grade, and ECOG performance status were independent prognostic factors for survival. The median OS for N0R0, N0R1, N+R0, and N+R1 was 38, 30, 18, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data indicate that in the presence of positive regional lymph nodes, resection margin status does not determine OS or RFS in patients with pCCA. Achieving negative margins in patients with positive nodes should not come at the expense of more extensive surgery and associated higher mortality.

摘要

背景

据报道,淋巴结转移和切缘阳性是肝门周围胆管癌(pCCA)切除术后患者总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)较差的主要决定因素。然而,独立于切缘状态的阳性淋巴结对OS的预后价值尚未得到评估。方法:从欧洲胆管癌(ENSCCA)登记处纳入1994年至2021年间接受pCCA切除术的患者进行这项回顾性队列研究。主要结局是根据切缘和淋巴结状态分层的OS。次要结局是无复发生存期。结果:共纳入来自11个不同中心和6个欧洲国家的325例患者。其中,194例(59.7%)患者切缘阴性。113例(34.8%)患者发现阳性淋巴结。淋巴结状态、组织学分级和ECOG体能状态是生存的独立预后因素。N0R0、N0R1、N+R0和N+R1患者的中位OS分别为38、30、18和12个月(p<0.001)。结论:这些数据表明,在存在区域淋巴结阳性的情况下,切缘状态并不能决定pCCA患者的OS或RFS。在淋巴结阳性的患者中实现切缘阴性不应以更广泛的手术和更高的相关死亡率为代价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/b4fd42bd42f7/cancers-14-02389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/c7b34ab5affe/cancers-14-02389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/38a54362790a/cancers-14-02389-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/b4fd42bd42f7/cancers-14-02389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/c7b34ab5affe/cancers-14-02389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/38a54362790a/cancers-14-02389-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/9140174/b4fd42bd42f7/cancers-14-02389-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry.阳性淋巴结和切缘状态对切除的肝门部胆管癌患者总生存的影响:ENSCCA注册研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 12;14(10):2389. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102389.
2
Radiographic features predictive of recurrence and survival after surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门周围胆管癌手术切除后预测复发和生存的影像学特征。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 29;10(7):e28805. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28805. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
3
High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the bile duct margin in patients with surgically resected node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor survival: a retrospective study.手术切除淋巴结阴性肝门周围胆管癌患者胆管边缘高级别发育不良/原位癌与生存不良相关:一项回顾性研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Aug;24(8):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.481. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
Cholangiocarcinoma landscape in Europe: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic insights from the ENSCCA Registry.欧洲胆管癌全景:ENSCCA 注册中心的诊断、预后和治疗见解。
J Hepatol. 2022 May;76(5):1109-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
5
[Surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma:a single-center experience].[肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗:单中心经验]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 29;61(5):381-388. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20221229-00550.
6
Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: location, number, or ratio of involved nodes.评估肝门周围胆管癌的淋巴结状态:位置、数量或受累淋巴结的比例。
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):718-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182822277.
7
Prognostic impact of proximal ductal margin status in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma according to the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis.根据有无淋巴结转移,近端胆管边缘状态对肝门周围胆管癌的预后影响。
Surgery. 2023 Jul;174(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Radial and longitudinal margins in surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: When R1 definition is associated with different prognosis.肝门周围胆管癌手术的横径和纵径边界:当 R1 定义与不同预后相关时。
Surgery. 2023 Sep;174(3):447-456. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
9
Recurrence after curative-intent resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of a large cohort with a close postoperative follow-up approach.根治性切除后肝门周围胆管癌的复发:采用密切术后随访方法的大型队列分析。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):732-738. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.011. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
The Prognostic Role of True Radical Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma after Improved Evaluation of Radial Margin Status.经改良评估切缘状态后,真正根治性切除在肝门部胆管癌中的预后作用
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;14(24):6126. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246126.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for survival prediction of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection.基于机器学习的列线图用于肝门部胆管癌根治性切除术后患者生存预测的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):25220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10329-y.
2
Anatomical hepatectomy for achieving textbook outcome for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated with curative-intent resection: A multicenter study.旨在通过根治性切除实现肝门部胆管癌教科书式治疗效果的解剖性肝切除术:一项多中心研究。
ILIVER. 2022 Nov 13;1(4):245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.10.004. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cholangiocarcinoma landscape in Europe: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic insights from the ENSCCA Registry.欧洲胆管癌全景:ENSCCA 注册中心的诊断、预后和治疗见解。
J Hepatol. 2022 May;76(5):1109-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
2
Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝门周围及肝内胆管癌的当前外科治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;13(15):3657. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153657.
3
The value of lymphadenectomy in surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Review of the Current Literature.
肝门部胆管癌的微创手术——当前文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 27;14(11):3748. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113748.
4
Adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation in patients with resected biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.辅助化疗与观察等待治疗在胆管癌切除术后患者中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0295583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295583. eCollection 2025.
5
Improving postoperative survival in cholangiocarcinoma: development of surgical strategies with a screening program in the epidemic region.提高胆管癌术后生存率:在流行地区开展筛查计划的外科策略制定。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct 31;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03573-5.
6
ASO Author Reflections: Palliative Therapy Might be an Alternative When the Risks of Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma are High.ASO作者反思:当肝门部胆管癌手术风险较高时,姑息治疗可能是一种替代方案。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6569-6570. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15830-8. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
Comparing Survival of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma After R1 Resection Versus Palliative Chemotherapy for Unresected Localized Disease.比较不可切除局部疾病行 R1 切除与姑息化疗后肝门部胆管癌的生存情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6495-6503. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15582-5. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
8
Insights for clinical management from the real-life data of the centralized West of Scotland biliary cancer clinic.从集中在苏格兰西部的胆道肿瘤临床中心的真实数据中获得的临床管理见解。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 16;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12279-6.
9
Adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancers.胆道癌的辅助治疗。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Mar 28;15:17588359231163785. doi: 10.1177/17588359231163785. eCollection 2023.
10
Perihilar-cholangiocarcinoma: what really matters?肝门部胆管癌:真正重要的是什么?
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022 Aug;11(4):616-619. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-225.
肝门周围胆管癌手术切除中淋巴结清扫术的价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;26(9):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01967-z. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
A tailored approach in lymph node-positive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.有针对性的方法治疗淋巴结阳性肝门部胆管癌。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1499-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02154-4. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
External validation study of the 8 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience in China and proposal for simplification.美国癌症联合委员会第8版肝门部胆管癌分期系统的外部验证研究:中国单中心经验及简化建议
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(2):806-818. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-348.
6
Surgery for Bismuth-Corlette Type 4 Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Results from a Western Multicenter Collaborative Group.西方多中心协作组研究:毕罗氏Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌的手术治疗结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7719-7729. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09905-z. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Extended lymphadenectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: What it will bring?肝门部胆管癌扩大淋巴结清扫术:会带来什么?
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 28;26(24):3318-3325. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3318.
8
Time to Recurrence After Surgical Resection and Survival After Recurrence Among Patients with Perihilar and Distal Cholangiocarcinomas.肝门部和远端胆管癌患者手术切除后的复发时间和复发后的生存时间。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4171-4180. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08534-2. Epub 2020 May 3.
9
Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版肝胆管癌分期系统对肝门周围胆管癌的预后预测:与第 7 版相比,改善有限。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):886-895. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Lymph Node Dissection During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy in Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.吲哚菁绿示踪剂引导腹腔镜胃癌根治术中淋巴结清扫的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):300-311. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033.