Moia Riccardo, Patriarca Andrea, Schipani Mattia, Ferri Valentina, Favini Chiara, Sagiraju Sruthi, Al Essa Wael, Gaidano Gianluca
Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 10;12(3):642. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030642.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia in western countries, with an incidence of approximately 5.1/100,000 new cases per year. Some patients may never require treatment, whereas others relapse early after front line therapeutic approaches. Recent whole genome and whole exome sequencing studies have allowed a better understanding of CLL pathogenesis and the identification of genetic lesions with potential clinical relevance. Consistently, precision medicine plays a pivotal role in the treatment algorithm of CLL, since the integration of molecular biomarkers with the clinical features of the disease may guide treatment choices. Most CLL patients present at the time of diagnosis with an early stage disease and are managed with a watch and wait strategy. For CLL patients requiring therapy, the CLL treatment armamentarium includes both chemoimmunotherapy strategies and biological drugs. The efficacy of these treatment strategies relies upon specific molecular features of the disease. disruption (including both mutation and 17p deletion) is the strongest predictor of chemo-refractoriness, and the assessment of status is the first and most important decisional node in the first line treatment algorithm. The presence of disruption mandates treatment with biological drugs that inhibit the B cell receptor or, alternatively, the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) pathway and can, at least in part, circumvent the chemorefractoriness of -disrupted patients. Beside disruption, the mutational status of immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) genes also helps clinicians to improve treatment tailoring. In fact, patients carrying mutated IGHV genes in the absence of disruption experience a long-lasting and durable response to chemoimmunotherapy after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) treatment with a survival superimposable to that of a matched general population. In contrast, patients with unmutated IGHV genes respond poorly to chemoimmunotherapy and deserve treatment with B cell receptor inhibitors. Minimal residual disease is also emerging as a relevant biomarker with potential clinical implications. Overall, precision medicine is now a mainstay in the management and treatment stratification of CLL. The identification of novel predictive biomarkers will allow further improvements in the treatment tailoring of this leukemia.
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)是西方国家最常见的白血病类型,每年新发病例的发病率约为5.1/10万。一些患者可能永远不需要治疗,而另一些患者在一线治疗方法后早期复发。最近的全基因组和全外显子测序研究有助于更好地理解CLL的发病机制,并识别具有潜在临床相关性的基因损伤。一致地,精准医学在CLL的治疗方案中起着关键作用,因为分子生物标志物与疾病临床特征的整合可以指导治疗选择。大多数CLL患者在诊断时处于疾病早期,采用观察等待策略进行管理。对于需要治疗的CLL患者,CLL治疗手段包括化疗免疫治疗策略和生物药物。这些治疗策略的疗效依赖于疾病的特定分子特征。TP53基因破坏(包括突变和17p缺失)是化疗难治性的最强预测指标,TP53状态评估是一线治疗方案中的首要也是最重要的决策节点。TP53基因破坏的存在要求使用抑制B细胞受体或B细胞淋巴瘤2(BCL2)途径的生物药物进行治疗,并且至少可以部分规避TP53基因破坏患者的化疗难治性。除了TP53基因破坏,免疫球蛋白重链可变区(IGHV)基因的突变状态也有助于临床医生改进治疗方案。事实上,在没有TP53基因破坏的情况下携带突变IGHV基因的患者在接受氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗(FCR)治疗后对化疗免疫治疗有持久的反应,其生存率与匹配的普通人群相当。相比之下,IGHV基因未突变的患者对化疗免疫治疗反应较差,应使用B细胞受体抑制剂进行治疗。微小残留病也正在成为一种具有潜在临床意义的相关生物标志物。总体而言,精准医学现在是CLL管理和治疗分层的主要支柱。新型预测生物标志物的识别将进一步改善这种白血病的治疗方案。