Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Department of Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6690-1.
The current study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPA) who did not benefit from resection considering the treatment strategy in the clinical settings.
Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 234 patients underwent induction chemotherapy for LAPA that could not be treated with surgery. After oncologic restaging, continuous chemotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT) was decided for patients without metastatic disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS), and the Wilcoxon test to compare survival curves. Multivariate analysis was performed using the stepwise logistic regression method.
FOLFIRINOX was the most common induction regimen (168 patients, 72%), with a median of 6 chemotherapy cycles and resulted in higher OS, compared to gemcitabine (19 vs. 16 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.6, P = .03). However, no difference was observed after adjusting for age (≤75 years) and performance status score (0-1). At restaging, 187 patients (80%) had non-metastatic disease: CRT was administered to 126 patients (67%) while chemotherapy was continued in 61 (33%). Patients who received CRT had characteristics comparable to those who continued with chemotherapy, with similar OS. They also had longer progression-free survival (median 13.3 vs. 9.6 months, HR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1-1.9, P < .01) and limited short-term treatment-related toxicity.
The median survival of patients who could not undergo surgery was 19 months. Hence, CRT should not be eliminated as a treatment option and may be useful as a part of optimised sequential chemotherapy for both local and metastatic disease.
本研究旨在评估无法手术的局部晚期不可切除非转移性胰腺腺癌(LAPA)患者的治疗结局,这些患者未从手术治疗策略中获益。
2010 年至 2017 年间,共有 234 例 LAPA 患者接受了无法手术的诱导化疗。在进行肿瘤学重新分期后,无转移疾病的患者继续接受单纯化疗或放化疗(CRT)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算总生存期(OS),Wilcoxon 检验比较生存曲线。采用逐步逻辑回归法进行多变量分析。
FOLFIRINOX 是最常用的诱导方案(168 例,72%),中位化疗周期为 6 个,与吉西他滨相比,OS 更高(19 个月 vs. 16 个月,风险比(HR)=1.2,95%置信区间:0.86-1.6,P=0.03)。然而,在调整年龄(≤75 岁)和表现状态评分(0-1)后,差异无统计学意义。重新分期时,187 例(80%)患者为非转移性疾病:126 例(67%)患者接受 CRT,61 例(33%)患者继续化疗。接受 CRT 的患者与继续化疗的患者具有相似的特征,OS 相似。他们的无进展生存期也更长(中位 13.3 个月 vs. 9.6 个月,HR=1.38,95%置信区间:1-1.9,P<0.01),且短期治疗相关毒性有限。
无法手术患者的中位生存时间为 19 个月。因此,CRT 不应作为一种治疗选择被排除,它可能作为局部和转移性疾病的优化序贯化疗的一部分而有用。