Suppr超能文献

肝上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肝细胞癌的超声造影表现及鉴别诊断。

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma Compared with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1403-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Abstract

Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) has malignant potential that can easily be misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the treatment options of these conditions are different. This retrospective study investigated whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can differentiate EAML from HCC. We included 24 patients with pathologically confirmed EAML and 36 patients with HCC who underwent pre-operative conventional ultrasound and CEUS. The conventional ultrasound and CEUS features of the two groups were analyzed. Time intensity curves (TICs) were analyzed for all lesions using quantitative perfusion analysis software. This study found that significant differences existed between the EAML and HCC groups in terms of clinical features such as sex, age, symptoms, alpha-fetoprotein and history of hepatitis B virus infection (p < 0.05). Tumor size, number, border and echogenicity on conventional ultrasound were significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding CEUS, EAML was more likely to have a centripetal enhancement pattern than HCC (p < 0.05). The tumor enhancement degree in the delayed phase in CEUS was significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Quantitative analysis of CEUS parameters revealed that the wash-in area under the curve (AUC) was larger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Time to peak was significantly shorter in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). The peak intensity was significantly stronger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding the diagnostic performance of CEUS parameters that showed statistical significance on univariate analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing EAML from HCC was 66.7%-100.0% and 55.6%-91.7%, respectively. Overall, CEUS could be valuable in differentiating EAML from HCC. Specific features such as the centripetal filling and prolonged enhancement patterns on CEUS, higher peak intensity, bigger wash-in AUC and shorter time to peak on TICs may contribute to a more confirmative differential diagnosis of EAML.

摘要

肝上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤 (EAML) 具有恶性潜能,容易误诊为肝细胞癌 (HCC),但两种疾病的治疗方法不同。本回顾性研究旨在探讨对比增强超声 (CEUS) 是否可区分 EAML 与 HCC。我们纳入了 24 例经病理证实的 EAML 患者和 36 例 HCC 患者,所有患者均行术前常规超声和 CEUS 检查。分析两组患者的常规超声和 CEUS 特征。使用定量灌注分析软件对所有病变的时间-强度曲线 (TIC) 进行分析。本研究发现,EAML 组与 HCC 组在性别、年龄、症状、甲胎蛋白和乙型肝炎病毒感染史等临床特征方面存在显著差异 (p < 0.05)。EAML 组与 HCC 组在肿瘤大小、数量、边界和回声方面存在显著差异 (p < 0.05)。CEUS 检查方面,EAML 更倾向于表现为向心性增强模式,而 HCC 则倾向于离心性增强模式 (p < 0.05)。CEUS 延迟期肿瘤增强程度在 EAML 与 HCC 之间存在显著差异 (p < 0.05)。CEUS 参数的定量分析显示,EAML 的曲线下面积 (AUC) 明显大于 HCC (p < 0.05)。EAML 的达峰时间明显短于 HCC (p < 0.05)。EAML 的峰值强度明显强于 HCC (p < 0.05)。对于单因素分析有统计学意义的 CEUS 参数,用于区分 EAML 与 HCC 的敏感度和特异度分别为 66.7%-100.0%和 55.6%-91.7%。总之,CEUS 可用于区分 EAML 与 HCC。CEUS 上表现出的向心性填充和延长强化模式、更高的峰值强度、更大的 AUC 和更短的达峰时间等特征可能有助于更明确地诊断 EAML。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验