Suppr超能文献

评估营利性公益公司作为抗生素开发和商业化的一种额外结构。

Evaluating for-profit public benefit corporations as an additional structure for antibiotic development and commercialization.

机构信息

School of Law, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

F2G Limited, Lankro Way, Eccles, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Transl Res. 2020 Jun;220:182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

While antibiotics are a key infrastructure underpinning modern medicine, evolution will continue to undermine their effectiveness, requiring continuous investment to sustain antibiotic effectiveness. The antibiotic R&D ecosystem is in peril, moving towards collapse. Key stakeholders have identified pull incentives such as Market Entry Rewards or subscription models as the key long-term solution. If substantial Market Entry Rewards or other pull incentives become possible, there is every reason to expect that for-profit companies will return to the antibiotic field. However, the political and financial will to develop such Market Entry Rewards or other similar incentives may be difficult to muster in the timeframes needed to prevent further diminishment of antibiotic research and development, especially if large drug companies are seen as substantial beneficiaries of these taxpayer-funded pull incentives. Bridging solutions are required from private actors in the interim. This article explores potential solutions led by private actors, including (1) traditional for-profit companies; (2) non-profit enterprises; and (3) public benefit corporations with lower profit expectations, akin to a public utility. All face similar commercial struggles, but nonprofits and public benefit corporations can accept lower profit expectations and might be more politically attractive recipients of pull incentives.

摘要

虽然抗生素是现代医学的重要基础,但进化仍将继续削弱其有效性,需要持续投资来维持抗生素的有效性。抗生素研发生态系统正处于危险之中,走向崩溃。主要利益相关者已经确定了市场准入奖励或订阅模式等拉动激励措施是长期解决方案的关键。如果有大量的市场准入奖励或其他类似的拉动激励措施成为可能,那么完全有理由期望营利性公司将重返抗生素领域。然而,在需要的时间内,开发这些市场准入奖励或其他类似激励措施的政治和财政意愿可能难以调动,特别是如果大型制药公司被视为这些由纳税人出资的拉动激励措施的主要受益者。在此期间,需要私人行为者提供桥梁解决方案。本文探讨了由私人行为者主导的潜在解决方案,包括 (1) 传统营利性公司;(2) 非营利企业;和 (3) 利润预期较低的公益公司,类似于公用事业公司。所有这些都面临着类似的商业斗争,但非营利组织和公益公司可以接受较低的利润预期,并且可能更受政治青睐,成为拉动激励措施的受益者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验