• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与原发性脑出血部位相关的 10 年内卒中复发、残疾、痴呆和费用风险:基于人群的研究。

Ten-year risks of recurrent stroke, disability, dementia and cost in relation to site of primary intracerebral haemorrhage: population-based study.

机构信息

Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.

Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;91(6):580-585. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322663. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2019-322663
PMID:32165376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7279204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are at increased long-term risks of recurrent stroke and other comorbidities. However, available estimates come predominantly from hospital-based studies with relatively short follow-up. Moreover, there are also uncertainties about the influence of ICH location on risks of recurrent stroke, disability, dementia and quality of life.

METHODS

In a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study/2002-2018) of patients with a first ICH with follow-up to 10 years, we determined the long-term risks of recurrent stroke, disability, quality of life, dementia and hospital care costs stratified by haematoma location.

RESULTS

Of 255 cases with primary ICH (mean/SD age 75.5/13.1), 109 (42.7%) had lobar ICH, 144 (56.5%) non-lobar ICH and 2 (0.8%) had uncertain location. Annual rates of recurrent ICH were higher after lobar versus non-lobar ICH (lobar=4.0%, 2.7-7.2 vs 1.1%, 0.3-2.8; p=0.02). Moreover, cumulative rate of dementia was also higher for lobar versus non-lobar ICH (n/% lobar=20/36.4% vs 16/20.8%, p=0.047), and there was a higher proportion of disability at 5 years in survivors (15/60.0% vs 9/31.0%, p=0.03). The 10-year quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were also lower after lobar versus non-lobar ICH (2.9 vs 3.8 for non-lobar, p=0.04). Overall, the mean 10-year censor-adjusted costs were £19 292, with over 80% of costs due to inpatient hospital admission costs, which did not vary by haematoma location (p=0.90).

CONCLUSION

Compared with non-lobar ICH, the substantially higher 10-year risks of recurrent stroke, dementia and lower QALYs after lobar ICH highlight the need for more effective prevention for this patient group.

摘要

背景

原发性脑出血(ICH)患者长期存在复发性中风和其他合并症的风险增加。然而,现有评估主要来自于随访时间相对较短的基于医院的研究。此外,ICH 位置对复发性中风、残疾、痴呆和生活质量风险的影响也存在不确定性。

方法

在一项基于人群的研究(牛津血管研究/2002-2018 年)中,我们对首次 ICH 患者进行了长达 10 年的随访,根据血肿位置对复发性中风、残疾、生活质量、痴呆和住院护理费用的长期风险进行了分层。

结果

在 255 例原发性 ICH 患者中(平均/标准差年龄 75.5/13.1),109 例(42.7%)为皮质下ICH,144 例(56.5%)为非皮质下 ICH,2 例(0.8%)为位置不确定。皮质下 ICH 后复发性 ICH 的年发生率高于非皮质下 ICH(皮质下=4.0%,2.7-7.2% vs 1.1%,0.3-2.8%;p=0.02)。此外,皮质下 ICH 的痴呆累积发生率也高于非皮质下 ICH(皮质下 20/36.4%,非皮质下 16/20.8%,p=0.047),且幸存者在 5 年内残疾比例更高(皮质下 15/60.0%,非皮质下 9/31.0%,p=0.03)。皮质下 ICH 后的 10 年质量调整生命年(QALYs)也低于非皮质下 ICH(皮质下 2.9,非皮质下 3.8,p=0.04)。总体而言,10 年平均 censored-adjusted 成本为 19292 英镑,其中超过 80%的成本归因于住院治疗费用,这与血肿位置无关(p=0.90)。

结论

与非皮质下 ICH 相比,皮质下 ICH 后 10 年复发性中风、痴呆风险显著增加,QALYs 降低,这突出表明需要为这一患者群体制定更有效的预防措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/7279204/8b4ef55b1372/jnnp-2019-322663f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/7279204/06ccdf7c032b/jnnp-2019-322663f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/7279204/8b4ef55b1372/jnnp-2019-322663f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/7279204/06ccdf7c032b/jnnp-2019-322663f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/7279204/8b4ef55b1372/jnnp-2019-322663f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten-year risks of recurrent stroke, disability, dementia and cost in relation to site of primary intracerebral haemorrhage: population-based study.与原发性脑出血部位相关的 10 年内卒中复发、残疾、痴呆和费用风险:基于人群的研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;91(6):580-585. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322663. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Risks of recurrent stroke and all serious vascular events after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: pooled analyses of two population-based studies.自发性脑出血后复发卒中及所有严重血管事件的风险:两项基于人群的研究的 pooled 分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jun;20(6):437-447. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00075-2.
3
The risk of recurrent stroke after intracerebral haemorrhage.脑出血后复发性中风的风险。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;78(8):836-40. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.106500. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
4
Association Between Blood Pressure Control and Risk of Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage.血压控制与复发性脑出血风险之间的关联
JAMA. 2015 Sep 1;314(9):904-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10082.
5
Dementia is strongly associated with 90-day mortality in lobar cerebral amyloid angiopathy related intra-cerebral haemorrhage.痴呆与脑叶性脑淀粉样血管病相关脑出血的 90 天死亡率密切相关。
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov 15;322(1-2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.047. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Recurrent stroke after lobar and deep intracerebral hemorrhage: a hospital-based cohort study.脑叶和深部脑出血后再发卒中:一项基于医院的队列研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(3):283-8. doi: 10.1159/000330643. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Influence of intracerebral hemorrhage location on incidence, characteristics, and outcome: population-based study.脑出血部位对发病率、特征及预后的影响:基于人群的研究
Stroke. 2015 Feb;46(2):361-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007953. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Assessment of Incidence and Risk Factors of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Participants in the Framingham Heart Study Between 1948 and 2016.评估 1948 年至 2016 年间弗雷明汉心脏研究参与者中脑出血的发生率和危险因素。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1252-1260. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1512.
9
Longer term stroke risk in intracerebral haemorrhage survivors.脑出血幸存者的长期卒中风险。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;91(8):840-845. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323079. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Major Cardiovascular Events After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Hematoma Location.血肿位置与自发性脑出血后主要心血管事件的相关性
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e235882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5882.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemorrhagic Coagulation Disorders and Ischemic Stroke: How to Reconcile Both?出血性凝血障碍与缺血性卒中:如何协调二者?
Neurol Int. 2023 Nov 30;15(4):1443-1458. doi: 10.3390/neurolint15040093.
2
The impact of antiplatelet drugs on recurrent stroke in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.抗血小板药物对脑出血患者复发性卒中的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 3;9(11):e21988. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21988. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Association of Prior Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.先前颅内出血与主要不良心血管事件的关联。

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial.脑出血性卒中后抗血小板治疗的效果(RESTART):一项随机、开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2613-2623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30840-2. Epub 2019 May 22.
2
Five-Year Risk of Major Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Events After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血后 5 年内主要缺血性和出血性事件的风险。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1100-1107. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024449.
3
Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford Vascular Study.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34215.
4
Association of Natriuretic Peptide With Adverse Outcomes and Disease Severity After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.利钠肽与脑出血后不良结局及疾病严重程度的关联:一项系统评价
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 15;12:775085. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.775085. eCollection 2021.
5
Validity of Simple Algorithms to Identify Recurrence of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Two Danish Nationwide Registries.两种丹麦全国性登记处中用于识别脑出血复发的简单算法的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 9;13:949-958. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S333624. eCollection 2021.
6
Stroke Prevention After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Where Are We Now?脑出血后预防卒中:我们现在处于什么阶段?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Oct 1;23(11):162. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01594-0.
7
Risks of recurrent stroke and all serious vascular events after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: pooled analyses of two population-based studies.自发性脑出血后复发卒中及所有严重血管事件的风险:两项基于人群的研究的 pooled 分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jun;20(6):437-447. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00075-2.
8
Acute intracerebral haemorrhage: diagnosis and management.急性脑出血:诊断与管理
Pract Neurol. 2020 Dec 7;21(2):128-36. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002763.
与短暂性脑缺血发作和中风相关的痴呆症的发病率和患病率:基于人群的牛津血管研究分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Mar;18(3):248-258. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30442-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
4
Hypertension and intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence among white, black, and Hispanic individuals.白人、黑人和西班牙裔人群的高血压和脑出血复发情况。
Neurology. 2018 Jul 3;91(1):e37-e44. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005729. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
5
Brain hemorrhage recurrence, small vessel disease type, and cerebral microbleeds: A meta-analysis.脑出血复发、小血管病类型与脑微出血:一项荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2017 Aug 22;89(8):820-829. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004259. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
Dementia risk after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.自发性脑出血后痴呆风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jul;15(8):820-829. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00130-7. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Apixaban versus Antiplatelet drugs or no antithrombotic drugs after anticoagulation-associated intraCerebral HaEmorrhage in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (APACHE-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.阿哌沙班与抗血小板药物或房颤患者抗凝相关脑出血后不使用抗血栓药物对比研究(APACHE-AF):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Sep 4;16:393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0898-4.
8
Association Between Blood Pressure Control and Risk of Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage.血压控制与复发性脑出血风险之间的关联
JAMA. 2015 Sep 1;314(9):904-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10082.
9
Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.自发性脑出血管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)自发性脑出血管理指南
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):840-55. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12309. Epub 2014 Aug 24.