Hurley James C
Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Division of Internal Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jan 29;2(1):e0076. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000076. eCollection 2020 Jan.
To test the postulate that concurrent control patients within ICUs studying topical oropharyngeal antibiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality would experience spillover effects from the intervention.
Studies cited in 15 systematic reviews of various topical antibiotic and other infection prevention interventions among ICU patients.
Studies of topical antibiotics, stratified into concurrent control versus nonconcurrent control designs. Studies of nondecontamination-based infection prevention interventions provide additional points of reference. Studies with no infection prevention intervention provide the mortality benchmark. Data from additional studies and data reported as intention to treat were used within sensitivity tests.
Mortality incidence proportion data, mortality census, study characteristics, group mean age, ICU type, and study publication year.
Two-hundred six studies were included. The summary effect sizes for ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality prevention derived in the 15 systematic reviews were replicated. The mean ICU mortality incidence for concurrent control groups of topical antibiotic studies (28.5%; 95% CI, 25.0-32.3; = 41) is higher versus the benchmark (23.7%; 19.2-28.5%; = 34), versus nonconcurrent control groups (23.5%; 19.3-28.3; = 14), and versus intervention groups (24.4%; 22.1-26.9; = 62) of topical antibiotic studies. In meta-regression models adjusted for group-level characteristics such as group mean age and publication year, concurrent control group membership within a topical antibiotic study remains associated with higher mortality ( = 0.027), whereas other group memberships, including membership within an antiseptic study, are each neutral ( = not significant).
Within topical antibiotic studies, the concurrent control group mortality incidence proportions are inexplicably high, whereas the intervention group mortality proportions are paradoxically similar to a literature-derived benchmark. The unexplained ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality excess in the concurrent control groups implicates spillover effects within studies of topical antibiotics. The apparent ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality prevention effects require cautious interpretation.
验证以下假设:在重症监护病房(ICU)中,同时纳入的对照患者在参与局部口咽抗生素预防呼吸机相关性肺炎及死亡率的研究时,会受到干预措施的溢出效应影响。
15项关于ICU患者各种局部抗生素及其他感染预防干预措施的系统评价中引用的研究。
局部抗生素研究,分为同时对照设计与非同时对照设计。基于非去污的感染预防干预措施的研究提供了额外的参考点。未进行感染预防干预的研究提供了死亡率基准。敏感性测试中使用了其他研究的数据以及按意向性分析报告的数据。
死亡率发生率比例数据、死亡人数统计、研究特征、组平均年龄、ICU类型及研究发表年份。
纳入206项研究。重复了15项系统评价中得出的呼吸机相关性肺炎及死亡率预防的汇总效应量。局部抗生素研究的同时对照组的ICU平均死亡率发生率(28.5%;95%置信区间,25.0 - 32.3;n = 41)高于基准(23.7%;19.2 - 28.5%;n = 34)、非同时对照组(23.5%;19.3 - 28.3;n = 14)以及局部抗生素研究的干预组(24.4%;22.1 - 26.9;n = 62)。在针对组水平特征(如组平均年龄和发表年份)进行调整的meta回归模型中,局部抗生素研究中的同时对照组成员身份仍与较高死亡率相关(P = 0.027),而其他组成员身份,包括防腐剂研究中的成员身份,均为中性(P = 无显著性)。
在局部抗生素研究中,同时对照组的死亡率发生率比例高得无法解释,而干预组的死亡率比例却反常地与文献得出的基准相似。同时对照组中无法解释的呼吸机相关性肺炎及死亡率过高暗示了局部抗生素研究中的溢出效应。明显的呼吸机相关性肺炎及死亡率预防效果需要谨慎解读。