Suppr超能文献

二参数与三参数前列腺 MRI 诊断准确性:评估临床实践中的对比获益。

Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Radiology Section, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4039-4049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) in prostate MR in clinical practice.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-four patients underwent prostate MRI, with T2 and DWI sequences initially interpreted, prior to full multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation using a Likert 1-5 scale. A prospective opinion was given on likely benefit of contrast prior to review of the DCE sequence, and retrospectively following full mpMRI review. The final histology result following targeted and/or systematic biopsy of the prostate was used for outcome purposes.

RESULTS

Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and mpMRI were assigned the same score in 86% of cases; when dichotomising to a negative or positive MRI (Likert score ≥ 3), concordance increased to 92.8%. At Likert score ≥ 3 bpMRI detected 89.9% of all cancers and 93.5% clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa) and mpMRI 90.7% and 94.6%, respectively. mpMRI had fewer false positives than bpMRI (11.4% vs 18.9%) and a lower Likert 3 rate (8.3% vs 17%), conferring higher specificity (74% vs 67%), but similar sensitivity (95% versus 94%) and ROC-AUC (90% vs 89%). At a positive MRI threshold of Likert ≥ 4, mpMRI had a higher sensitivity than bpMRI (89% versus 80%) and detected more csPCa (89.2% versus 79.6%). DCE was prospectively considered of potential benefit in 27.3%, but readers would only recall 11% of patients for DCE sequences, mainly to assess score 3 peripheral zone lesions. Following full mpMRI review, DCE was considered helpful in 28.4% of cases; in 23/75 (30.6%) of these cases this only became apparent after reviewing the sequence, reasons included increased confidence, presence of "safety-net" lesions or inflammatory lesions.

CONCLUSION

BpMRI has equivalent cancer detection rates to mpMRI; however, mpMRI had fewer Likert 3 call rates and increased specificity and was subjectively considered of benefit by readers in 28.4% of cases.

KEY POINTS

• bpMRI has similar cancer detection rates to the full mpMRI protocol at a positive MRI threshold of Likert 3. • mpMRI had fewer intermediate category 3 calls (8.3%) than bpMRI (17%) and fewer false positives than bpMRI (11.4% vs 18.9%), conferring higher specificity (74% vs 67%). • Readers considered DCE beneficial in 28.4% of cases, but in a relatively high number (30.6%) this only became apparent after reviewing the sequence.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)中动态对比增强(DCE)的临床应用价值。

方法

264 例患者接受了前列腺 MRI 检查,初始进行 T2 和 DWI 序列解读,之后采用 Likert 1-5 评分进行全参数 MRI(mpMRI)解读。在回顾 DCE 序列之前,前瞻性地评估对比剂的可能获益,并在完成全参数 MRI 解读后进行回顾性评估。以靶向和/或系统前列腺活检的最终组织学结果作为评估结果。

结果

在 86%的病例中,双参数 MRI(bpMRI)和 mpMRI 的评分相同;当将评分分为阴性或阳性(Likert 评分≥3)时,一致性增加至 92.8%。在 Likert 评分≥3 时,bpMRI 检测到 89.9%的所有癌症和 93.5%的临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa),mpMRI 分别检测到 90.7%和 94.6%。mpMRI 的假阳性率(11.4%)低于 bpMRI(18.9%),Likert 3 评分率(8.3%)也低于 bpMRI(17%),因此特异性(74% vs 67%)更高,但敏感性(95% vs 94%)和 ROC-AUC(90% vs 89%)相似。在阳性 MRI 阈值 Likert≥4 时,mpMRI 的敏感性(89%)高于 bpMRI(80%),且检测到更多的 csPCa(89.2% vs 79.6%)。DCE 在前瞻性评估中被认为具有潜在获益的比例为 27.3%,但读者仅会回忆起 11%的患者进行 DCE 序列检查,主要是为了评估评分 3 的外周区病变。在完成全参数 MRI 检查后,28.4%的病例认为 DCE 是有帮助的;在这 23/75(30.6%)例中,仅在回顾序列后才发现这一点,原因包括增加了信心、存在“安全网”病变或炎症性病变。

结论

bpMRI 与 mpMRI 相比,具有相同的癌症检出率;然而,mpMRI 的 Likert 3 评分较低,特异性较高,且在 28.4%的病例中,读者主观上认为其具有获益。

关键点

  • bpMRI 与全参数 mpMRI 协议在 Likert 3 阳性 MRI 阈值下具有相似的癌症检出率。

  • mpMRI 的中等类别 3 评分(8.3%)低于 bpMRI(17%),假阳性率(11.4%)低于 bpMRI(18.9%),因此特异性(74% vs 67%)更高。

  • 读者认为 DCE 在 28.4%的病例中有获益,但在相当多的病例(30.6%)中,只有在回顾序列后才发现这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验