Suppr超能文献

前瞻性评估动态对比增强(DCE)成像在前列腺癌检测中的价值,并与病理学相关联。

Prospective evaluation of the value of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging for prostate cancer detection, with pathology correlation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(3):10220-10227.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging in multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) for the detection and staging of prostate cancer in comparison with T2W and DWI images alone in biparametric MRI (bpMRI) in treatment naïve patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients who underwent a prostate MRI at our institution from June-August 2017, as well as a systematic ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy or prostatectomy, were included. Strictly following PIRADSv2, the MRI studies were independently interpreted by a body radiologist and a body-imaging fellow on two different occasions 8-10 weeks apart. Initially, with all mpMRI sequences and then without the DCE sequence (bpMRI). The readers were blinded to the clinical information. Ethics approval was obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred treatment-naïve patients were included (median age 64, age range 48-81, mean PSA 10.3). There was almost perfect intra-observer agreement for mpMRI versus bpMRI for both readers [Cohen's Kappa (k) 0.88-0.86] and substantial inter-observer agreement (k = 0.74 for mpMRI and 0.76 for bpMRI). The sensitivity and specificity did not significantly change between multi-parametric and bi-parametric MRI (Sensitivity 91.7% and 90%, Specificity of 85.5% and 85% for mpMRI and bpMRI, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, prostate MRI without DCE (bpMRI) is of comparable diagnostic accuracy to mpMRI in treatment-naïve patients. Performing prostate MRI without DCE (bpMRI) will reduce acquisition time, decrease cost and potentially improve patient safety.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在评估动态对比增强(DCE)成像在多参数前列腺 MRI(mpMRI)中检测和分期前列腺癌的价值,与治疗前单纯双参数 MRI(bpMRI)中的 T2W 和 DWI 图像相比。

材料和方法

我们纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 8 月在我们机构接受前列腺 MRI 检查的 100 例连续患者,以及系统超声引导下前列腺活检或前列腺切除术。严格按照 PIRADSv2,由一名身体放射科医生和一名身体成像研究员在两次不同的场合独立解读 MRI 研究,两次之间相隔 8-10 周。最初,使用所有 mpMRI 序列,然后不使用 DCE 序列(bpMRI)。读者对临床信息一无所知。获得了伦理批准。

结果

我们纳入了 100 例治疗前患者(中位年龄 64 岁,年龄范围 48-81 岁,平均 PSA 10.3)。对于两位读者,mpMRI 与 bpMRI 的观察者内一致性几乎完美[Cohen's Kappa(k)0.88-0.86],观察者间一致性也很强(mpMRI 的 k 值为 0.74,bpMRI 的 k 值为 0.76)。多参数 MRI 和双参数 MRI 之间的敏感性和特异性没有显著变化(mpMRI 和 bpMRI 的敏感性分别为 91.7%和 90%,特异性分别为 85.5%和 85%)。

结论

根据我们的发现,在治疗前患者中,没有 DCE(bpMRI)的前列腺 MRI 与 mpMRI 具有相当的诊断准确性。不进行 DCE(bpMRI)的前列腺 MRI 将减少采集时间,降低成本,并可能提高患者安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验