• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹腔镜腹侧和切口 IPOM Plus 疝修补术中网片面积与固定钉数量的理想比例。

Assessment of ideal ratio of mesh area to number of fixation tacks in laparoscopic ventral and incisional IPOM Plus hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Steyr General Hospital, Sierninger Straße 170, 4400, Steyr, Austria.

Department of Surgery, Kirchdorf General Hospital, Kirchdorf, Austria.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1230-1237. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07493-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07493-9
PMID:32166548
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To clarify the optimum mesh-tack ratio MTR (mesh area in cm divided by the number of fixation tacks) in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, we compared IPOM Plus procedures with more intensive mesh fixation to those with standard mesh fixation.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 84 patients (mean hernia width 6.6 ± 4.4 cm) intraoperatively received an intensive mesh fixation I-IPOM Plus with MTR ≤ 4:1 (e.g. ,150 cm mesh fixed by 50 tacks) and 74 patients (mean hernia width 6.7 ± 3.4 cm) received a standard mesh fixation S-IPOM Plus with MTR > 4:1 (e.g., 150 cm mesh fixed by 30 tacks) at a community hospital between 2014 and 2017. Outcomes in recurrence rates, immediate and chronic postoperative pain, as well as long-term functionality of the abdominal wall were then evaluated.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up time of 34 months, a 2.3% recurrence rate in I-IPOM Plus patients and a 13.5% recurrence rate in S-IPOM Plus patients were recorded (p = 0.018). The recurrence was associated with large hernia > 10 cm (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.4) and MTR > 5 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-3.8) in the multivariate analysis. There was a positive correlation between immediate postoperative pain intensity measured on day 7 and number of fixation tacks placed (I-IPOM Plus: mean 4.5 ± 2.5 VAS versus S-IPOM Plus: mean 2.7 ± 2.0 VAS, p = 0.001). However, there were no outcome differences in terms of length of immediate postoperative pain experience, sick leave duration, chronic pain rate and long-term abdominal wall functionality between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

For ventral and incisional hernia patients with multiple recurrence risk factors, a mesh-tack ratio MTR ≤ 4:1 should be applied in laparoscopic IPOM Plus procedures.

摘要

背景

为了明确腹腔镜腹疝和切口疝修补术中最佳的网片钉合比(网片面积除以固定钉数量),我们比较了采用更密集网片固定的 IPOM Plus 手术与标准网片固定的 IPOM Plus 手术。

方法

在一项回顾性队列研究中,84 例(平均疝宽 6.6±4.4cm)患者术中接受密集网片固定的 I-IPOM Plus 手术,网片钉合比 MTR≤4:1(例如,150cm 网片用 50 个钉固定),74 例(平均疝宽 6.7±3.4cm)患者接受标准网片固定的 S-IPOM Plus 手术,MTR>4:1(例如,150cm 网片用 30 个钉固定),手术均在社区医院进行,时间为 2014 年至 2017 年。然后评估复发率、即刻和慢性术后疼痛以及腹壁长期功能等结局。

结果

平均随访 34 个月后,I-IPOM Plus 组患者的复发率为 2.3%,S-IPOM Plus 组患者的复发率为 13.5%(p=0.018)。多变量分析显示,复发与大疝(>10cm)(OR 3.7,95%CI 1.3-5.4)和 MTR(>5)(OR 2.4,95%CI 1.1-3.8)有关。第 7 天测量的即刻术后疼痛强度与固定钉数量呈正相关(I-IPOM Plus:平均 4.5±2.5VAS 与 S-IPOM Plus:平均 2.7±2.0VAS,p=0.001)。然而,两组之间在即刻术后疼痛体验时间、病假持续时间、慢性疼痛率和长期腹壁功能方面无差异。

结论

对于有多种复发危险因素的腹疝和切口疝患者,腹腔镜 IPOM Plus 手术中应采用网片钉合比 MTR≤4:1。

相似文献

1
Assessment of ideal ratio of mesh area to number of fixation tacks in laparoscopic ventral and incisional IPOM Plus hernia repair.评估腹腔镜腹侧和切口 IPOM Plus 疝修补术中网片面积与固定钉数量的理想比例。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1230-1237. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07493-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
3
Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.网片固定技术在原发性腹侧或切口疝修补术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 28;5(5):CD011563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011563.pub2.
4
Mesh fixation in open IPOM procedure with tackers or sutures? A randomized clinical trial with preliminary results.网片固定在开放式 IPOM 手术中使用钉枪还是缝线?一项具有初步结果的随机临床试验。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01991-z. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.可吸收钉固定网片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术后的复发率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):541-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9750. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
6
Pain and convalescence following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛与康复
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4369.
7
Decreased re-operation rate for recurrence after defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with a permanent tack fixated mesh: a nationwide cohort study.使用永久钉固定补片的腹腔镜腹疝修补术中缺损闭合后复发的再次手术率降低:一项全国性队列研究
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1776-2. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience.扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa术(eTEP-RS)与腹腔内置片修补术(IPOM-plus)治疗W1-W2型中线切口疝的疗效比较——单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3260-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09922-x. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
"Comparative safety and efficacy of robotic TAPP and IPOM techniques in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes".机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)和腹腔内网片修补术(IPOM)在腹疝修补中的安全性和疗效比较:短期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03454-0.
2
An improved approach of totally visceral sac separation (TVS) for incisional hernia compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus repair (IPOM plus).与腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM plus)相比,一种改良的完全内脏囊分离(TVS)切口疝治疗方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 21;13(1):18037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45192-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Current Trends in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的当前趋势
JSLS. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00048.
Initial results of an indigenous absorbable tacker for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of 158 cases.
一种用于腹腔镜腹疝修补术中补片固定的国产可吸收钉合器的初步结果:158例回顾性分析
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02670-2. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
4
The Grip Concept of Incisional Hernia Repair-Dynamic Bench Test, CT Abdomen With Valsalva and 1-Year Clinical Results.切口疝修补的握力概念——动态台架试验、Valsalva动作下的腹部CT及1年临床结果
Front Surg. 2021 Apr 14;8:602181. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.602181. eCollection 2021.