The New England Center for Children and Northeastern University.
The New England Center for Children.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1638-1659. doi: 10.1002/jaba.695. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
A competing stimulus assessment (CSA) is commonly used to identify leisure items for use in treatments designed to decrease automatically reinforced problem behavior. However, this type of assessment may not yield useful information if participants do not readily engage with leisure items. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a modified CSA that included additional treatment components (i.e., prompting, prompting plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior). The modified CSA identified the treatment components and leisure items that were most effective for increasing leisure-item engagement and decreasing problem behavior for each participant. Modified CSA outcomes maintained during an extended treatment analysis in a natural setting and when intervention components were faded.
竞争刺激评估(CSA)通常用于确定休闲项目,以用于设计减少自动强化问题行为的治疗中。然而,如果参与者不易参与休闲项目,这种评估可能无法提供有用的信息。本研究的目的是评估一种改良的 CSA,其中包括额外的治疗成分(即提示、提示加替代行为的差异强化)。改良的 CSA 确定了对每个参与者增加休闲项目参与度和减少问题行为最有效的治疗成分和休闲项目。改良 CSA 的结果在自然环境中的扩展治疗分析中以及当干预成分逐渐消失时得以维持。