London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Jun;25(6):740-750. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13390. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Mass administration of azithromycin has reduced mortality in children in sub-Saharan Africa but its mode of action is not well characterised. A recent trial found that azithromycin given alongside seasonal malaria chemoprevention was not associated with a reduction in mortality or hospital admissions in young children. We investigated the effect of azithromycin on the nutritional status of children enrolled in this study.
A total of 19 578 children in Burkina Faso and Mali were randomised to receive either azithromycin or placebo alongside seasonal malaria chemoprevention with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine monthly for three malaria transmission seasons (2014-2016). After each transmission season, anthropometric measurements were collected from approximately 4000 randomly selected children (2000 per country) at a cross-sectional survey and used to derive nutritional status indicators. Binary and continuous outcomes between treatment arms were compared by Poisson and linear regression.
Nutritional status among children was poor in both countries with evidence of acute and chronic malnutrition (24.9-33.3% stunted, 15.8-32.0% underweight, 7.2-26.4% wasted). There was a suggestion of improvement in nutritional status in Burkina Faso and deterioration in Mali over the study period. At the end of each malaria transmission season, nutritional status of children did not differ between treatment arms (seasonal malaria chemoprevention plus azithromycin or placebo) in either the intention-to-treat or per-protocol analyses (only children with at least three cycles of SMC in the current intervention year).
The addition of azithromycin to seasonal malaria chemoprevention did not result in an improvement of nutritional outcomes in children in Burkina Faso and Mali.
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,大规模使用阿奇霉素可降低儿童死亡率,但阿奇霉素的作用机制尚未得到很好的描述。最近的一项试验发现,在季节性疟疾化学预防的基础上加用阿奇霉素,并不与降低幼儿死亡率或住院率相关。我们研究了在这项研究中入组的儿童接受阿奇霉素治疗对其营养状况的影响。
布基纳法索和马里共有 19578 名儿童被随机分配接受阿奇霉素或安慰剂,同时每月接受季节性疟疾化学预防(磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶加阿莫地喹),共三个疟疾传播季节(2014-2016 年)。在每个传播季节后,从大约 4000 名随机选择的儿童(每个国家 2000 名)中进行横断面调查,收集人体测量学测量数据,并用于得出营养状况指标。通过泊松和线性回归比较治疗组之间的二分类和连续结局。
两国儿童的营养状况均较差,有急性和慢性营养不良的证据(24.9%-33.3%发育迟缓,15.8%-32.0%体重不足,7.2%-26.4%消瘦)。在研究期间,布基纳法索的营养状况有所改善,马里则有所恶化。在每个疟疾传播季节结束时,意向治疗或按方案分析(仅在当前干预年度至少接受三个周期 SMC 的儿童)中,治疗组之间的营养状况在季节性疟疾化学预防加阿奇霉素或安慰剂之间没有差异。
在季节性疟疾化学预防中添加阿奇霉素并没有改善布基纳法索和马里儿童的营养结局。