• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便微生物组方法在婴幼儿 DNA 产量和测序中的可靠性。

Reliability of stool microbiome methods for DNA yields and sequencing among infants and young children.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

Microbiologyopen. 2020 May;9(5):e1018. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1018. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1002/mbo3.1018
PMID:32166902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7221451/
Abstract

With the emergence of large-scale epidemiologic human microbiome studies, there is a need to understand the reproducibility of microbial DNA sequencing and the impact of specimen collection and processing methods on measures of microbial community composition and structure, with reproducibility studies in infants and young children particularly lacking. Here, we examined batch-to-batch variability and reliability of collection, handling, and processing protocols, testing replicate stool samples from infants and young children using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V4-V5 hypervariable region, evaluating 33 conditions with different protocols and extraction methods. We detected no evidence of batch effects in replicate DNA samples or extractions from the same stool sample. Variability in DNA yield and alpha diversity was observed between the different collection, handling, and processing protocols. However, across all protocols, subject variability was the dominant contributor to microbiome structure, with comparatively little impact of the protocol used. While collection method and DNA extraction kit may affect DNA yield, and correspondingly alpha diversity, our findings suggest that characterization of the structure and composition of the fecal microbiome of infants and young children are reliably measurable by standardized collection, handling, and processing protocols and DNA extraction methods within an individual longitudinal study.

摘要

随着大规模的流行病学人类微生物组研究的出现,有必要了解微生物 DNA 测序的可重复性,以及样本采集和处理方法对微生物群落组成和结构测量的影响,而婴儿和幼儿的可重复性研究尤其缺乏。在这里,我们使用 Illumina MiSeq 对细菌 16S rRNA 基因 V4-V5 高变区进行测序,检测了来自婴儿和幼儿的重复粪便样本,以检查采集、处理和处理方案的批次间变异性和可靠性,测试了 33 种不同方案和提取方法的条件。我们没有在重复的 DNA 样本或来自同一粪便样本的提取中检测到批次效应的证据。在不同的采集、处理和处理方案之间观察到 DNA 产量和 alpha 多样性的可变性。然而,在所有方案中,主体变异性是微生物组结构的主要贡献者,而使用的方案的影响相对较小。虽然采集方法和 DNA 提取试剂盒可能会影响 DNA 产量,以及相应的 alpha 多样性,但我们的研究结果表明,在个体纵向研究中,通过标准化的采集、处理和处理方案以及 DNA 提取方法,可以可靠地测量婴儿和幼儿粪便微生物组的结构和组成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/1c894729c07d/MBO3-9-e1018-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/21b8357807e2/MBO3-9-e1018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/8107e736f437/MBO3-9-e1018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/a26b027fb5ca/MBO3-9-e1018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/4e74a0983df6/MBO3-9-e1018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/27f5301394e2/MBO3-9-e1018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/c985168f7754/MBO3-9-e1018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/072c3d9db88b/MBO3-9-e1018-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/1c894729c07d/MBO3-9-e1018-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/21b8357807e2/MBO3-9-e1018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/8107e736f437/MBO3-9-e1018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/a26b027fb5ca/MBO3-9-e1018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/4e74a0983df6/MBO3-9-e1018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/27f5301394e2/MBO3-9-e1018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/c985168f7754/MBO3-9-e1018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/072c3d9db88b/MBO3-9-e1018-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dd0/7221451/1c894729c07d/MBO3-9-e1018-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of stool microbiome methods for DNA yields and sequencing among infants and young children.粪便微生物组方法在婴幼儿 DNA 产量和测序中的可靠性。
Microbiologyopen. 2020 May;9(5):e1018. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1018. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.高通量粪便微生物组研究的 DNA 提取策略。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0293223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02932-23. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Method Validation for Extraction of DNA from Human Stool Samples for Downstream Microbiome Analysis.用于下游微生物组分析的人粪便样本DNA提取方法验证
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Apr;18(2):102-116. doi: 10.1089/bio.2019.0112. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.收集非胎粪粪便在粪便潜血卡片上是婴儿粪便微生物组研究的有效方法。
Microbiome. 2017 Sep 5;5(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0333-z.
5
Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.一种方便参与者的粪便收集方法用于微生物组分析的可靠性:迈向大样本量研究的一步。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1249-x.
6
Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.直肠拭子、手套尖和参与者采集粪便技术在肠道微生物组采样中的比较。
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3.
7
Rapidly Processed Stool Swabs Approximate Stool Microbiota Profiles.快速处理的粪便拭子可近似反映粪便微生物群特征。
mSphere. 2019 Apr 10;4(2):e00208-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00208-19.
8
Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.系统分析采样区域和储存方法对粪便肠道微生物组和代谢组谱的影响。
mSphere. 2020 Jan 8;5(1):e00763-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00763-19.
9
Quantifying technical confounders in microbiome studies.量化微生物组研究中的技术混杂因素。
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Feb 22;117(3):863-875. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa128.
10
Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.人类粪便样本的储存与处理会影响肠道微生物群组成:一项可行性研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Sep;164:105668. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105668. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective association of the infant gut microbiome with social behaviors in the ECHO consortium.ECHO 联盟中婴儿肠道微生物组与社会行为的前瞻性关联。
Mol Autism. 2024 May 17;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00597-2.
2
Machine-learning analysis of cross-study samples according to the gut microbiome in 12 infant cohorts.基于 12 项婴儿队列的肠道微生物组对跨研究样本进行机器学习分析。
mSystems. 2023 Dec 21;8(6):e0036423. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00364-23. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
3
The effect of low-abundance OTU filtering methods on the reliability and variability of microbial composition assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross Talk: The Microbiota and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.相互作用:微生物群与神经发育障碍
Front Neurosci. 2017 Sep 15;11:490. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00490. eCollection 2017.
2
Infant Gut Microbiome Associated With Cognitive Development.婴儿肠道微生物组与认知发展相关。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 15;83(2):148-159. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.肠道微生物群分析结果高度依赖于16S rRNA基因目标区域,而DNA提取的影响较小。
低丰度 OTU 过滤方法对 16S rRNA 扩增子测序评估的微生物组成的可靠性和可变性的影响。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jun 12;13:1165295. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1165295. eCollection 2023.
4
Contribution of gut bacteria to arsenic metabolism in the first year of life in a prospective birth cohort.肠道细菌对前瞻性出生队列生命第一年砷代谢的贡献。
Environ Res. 2022 Nov;214(Pt 4):114099. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114099. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
INFORMATION CONTENT OF HIGH-ORDER ASSOCIATIONS OF THE HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA NETWORK.人类肠道微生物群网络高阶关联的信息内容
Ann Appl Stat. 2021 Dec;15(4):1788-1807. doi: 10.1214/21-aoas1449. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Sex-specific relationships of the infant microbiome and early-childhood behavioral outcomes.婴儿微生物组与儿童早期行为结果的性别特异性关系。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Aug;92(2):580-591. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01785-z. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
7
The acidified drinking water-induced changes in the behavior and gut microbiota of wild-type mice depend on the acidification mode.酸化饮用水诱导的野生型小鼠行为和肠道微生物群的变化取决于酸化方式。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82570-0.
8
Role of gut microbiota in epigenetic regulation of colorectal Cancer.肠道微生物群在结直肠癌的表观遗传调控中的作用。
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021 Jan;1875(1):188490. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188490. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
J Biomol Tech. 2017 Apr;28(1):19-30. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2801-003. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Gut Microbiota: A Potential Regulator of Neurodevelopment.肠道微生物群:神经发育的潜在调节因子。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2017 Feb 7;11:25. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00025. eCollection 2017.
5
Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.微生物组研究中粪便样本采集方法的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 15;185(2):115-123. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww177. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
6
The Central Nervous System and the Gut Microbiome.中枢神经系统与肠道微生物群
Cell. 2016 Nov 3;167(4):915-932. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027.
7
Antibiotics, obesity and the link to microbes - what are we doing to our children?抗生素、肥胖以及与微生物的关联——我们对孩子做了什么?
BMC Med. 2016 Apr 19;14:57. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0605-7.
8
Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience.流行病学研究中肠道微生物群的特征:多民族队列研究经验
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 May;26(5):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
A gut (microbiome) feeling about the brain.对大脑的一种直觉(微生物群落感受)。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;32(2):96-102. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000244.
10
The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions.微生物组质量控制项目:基线研究设计与未来方向。
Genome Biol. 2015 Dec 9;16:276. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0841-8.