• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心微创肝切除术病例量评估。

Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):443-451. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11369. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.11369
PMID:32167174
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical outcomes may be associated with hospital volume and the influence of volume on minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is not known.

METHODS

Patients entered into the prospective registry of the Italian Group of MILS from 2014 to 2018 were considered. Only centres with an accrual period of at least 12 months and stable MILS activity during the enrolment period were included. Case volume was defined by the mean number of minimally invasive liver resections performed per month (MILS/month).

RESULTS

A total of 2225 MILS operations were undertaken by 46 centres; nine centres performed more than two MILS/month (1376 patients) and 37 centres carried out two or fewer MILS/month (849 patients). The proportion of resections of anterolateral segments decreased with case volume, whereas that of major hepatectomies increased. Left lateral sectionectomies and resections of anterolateral segments had similar outcome in the two groups. Resections of posterosuperior segments and major hepatectomies had higher overall and severe morbidity rates in centres performing two or fewer MILS/month than in those undertaking a larger number (posterosuperior segments resections: overall morbidity 30·4 versus 18·7 per cent respectively, and severe morbidity 9·9 versus 4·0 per cent; left hepatectomy: 46 versus 22 per cent, and 19 versus 5 per cent; right hepatectomy: 42 versus 34 per cent, and 25 versus 15 per cent).

CONCLUSION

A volume-outcome association existed for minimally invasive hepatectomy. Complex and major resections may be best managed in high-volume centres.

摘要

背景

手术结果可能与医院的手术量有关,但手术量对微创肝切除术(MILS)的影响尚不清楚。

方法

纳入 2014 年至 2018 年期间参加意大利 MILS 研究组前瞻性注册的患者。仅纳入有至少 12 个月累积期且在入组期间 MILS 活动稳定的中心。病例量定义为每月进行微创肝切除术的平均例数(MILS/月)。

结果

共进行了 2225 例 MILS 手术,由 46 个中心完成;9 个中心每月进行超过 2 例 MILS(1376 例患者),37 个中心每月进行 2 例或更少的 MILS(849 例患者)。随着病例量的增加,前外侧节段切除术的比例下降,而大肝切除术的比例增加。左外侧叶切除术和前外侧节段切除术在两组中的结果相似。在每月进行 2 例或更少 MILS 的中心,后上叶节段切除术和大肝切除术的总发病率和严重发病率均高于进行更多 MILS 的中心(后上叶节段切除术:总发病率分别为 30.4%和 18.7%,严重发病率分别为 9.9%和 4.0%;左半肝切除术:46%和 22%,19%和 5%;右半肝切除术:42%和 34%,25%和 15%)。

结论

微创肝切除术存在量效关系。复杂和大的切除术可能最好在高容量中心进行管理。

相似文献

1
Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy.多中心微创肝切除术病例量评估。
Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):443-451. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11369. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry.微创肝脏手术的扩散、结果与实施:来自I Go MILS(意大利微创肝脏手术小组)登记处的快照
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):271-283. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0489-x. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Minimally invasive liver surgery in a hepato-biliary unit: learning curve and indications.肝胆科的微创肝脏手术:学习曲线与适应证
Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0314-3. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery in France over the last decade.过去十年法国微创肝外科的发展。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4457-4467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10951-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Surgical Management of Hepatic Benign Disease: Have the Number of Liver Resections Increased in the Era of Minimally Invasive Approach? Analysis from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry.肝良性疾病的外科治疗:微创时代的肝切除术数量增加了吗?来自 I Go MILS(意大利微创肝外科组)注册研究的分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Oct;24(10):2233-2243. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04260-7. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Mils for HCC: the state of art.肝细胞癌的微创治疗:现状
Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):105-9. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0316-1. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
7
Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors.机构开展的首例100例肝脏肿瘤机器人肝切除术的经验及结果
Am Surg. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):200-207.
8
A propensity-matched study of full laparoscopic versus hand-assisted minimal-invasive liver surgery.一项关于全腹腔镜与手辅助微创肝脏手术的倾向匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2021-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07597-2. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
9
Ten years of Italian mini-invasiveness: the I Go MILS registry as a tool of dissemination, characterization and networking.十年的意大利微创探索:I Go MILS 登记作为传播、特征和网络构建的工具。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1457-1469. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01597-2. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
10
Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients.新加坡机器人肝切除术的初步经验:对43例连续患者的48例切除术的分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):201-205. doi: 10.1111/ans.14417. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Four clamp-crush techniques in robotic hepatectomy (with video).机器人肝切除术中的四种钳夹-压榨技术(附视频)
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Apr 30;16(2):778-785. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-918. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Multicenter Belgian prospective registry on minimally invasive and open liver surgery (BReLLS): experience from 1342 consecutive cases.比利时多中心微创与开放肝脏手术前瞻性注册研究(BReLLS):1342例连续病例的经验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 3;410(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03661-4.
3
Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study.
经门静脉栓塞化疗后腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的国际多中心研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae181.
4
Volume-outcome in oncological surgery: reflections on education and training.肿瘤外科手术中的手术量与治疗结果:关于教育与培训的思考
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1383-1386. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01600-w. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Ten years of Italian mini-invasiveness: the I Go MILS registry as a tool of dissemination, characterization and networking.十年的意大利微创探索:I Go MILS 登记作为传播、特征和网络构建的工具。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1457-1469. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01597-2. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Hospital Volume and Textbook Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌微创肝切除术中的医院手术量与教科书式预后
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):956-964. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05609-9. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
7
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery: A Snapshot from a Major Dutch HPB and Transplant Center.微创肝脏手术:荷兰主要肝胆胰和移植中心的一个快照。
World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):3090-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06754-z. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience.机器人肝脏切除术的短期疗效:单机构初步经验
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jan 27;14(1):224-233. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224.
9
The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.意大利关于同时性结直肠原发癌和肝转移瘤微创同期切除术的共识:德尔菲法。
Updates Surg. 2021 Aug;73(4):1247-1265. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
10
Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched evaluation.腹腔镜与开腹右后区段切除术的对比:一项国际性、多中心、倾向评分匹配评估。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6139-6149. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08109-y. Epub 2020 Nov 2.