M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Apr;53(4):541-554. doi: 10.1002/eat.23257. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Eating disorders (EDs) occur at higher rates among sexual/gender minorities (SGMs). We currently know little about the risk factor profile of SGMs entering ED specialty care.
To (a) compare history of abuse-related risk in SGMs to cisgender heterosexuals (CHs) when entering treatment, (b) determine if SGMs enter and exit treatment with more severe ED symptoms than CHs, and (c) determine if SGMs have different rates of improvement in ED symptoms during treatment compared to CHs.
We analyzed data from 2,818 individuals treated at a large, US-based, ED center, 471 (17%) of whom identified as SGM. Objective 1 was tested using logistic regression and Objectives 2 and 3 used mixed-effects models.
SGMs had higher prevalence of sexual abuse (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.71, 2.58), other trauma (e.g., verbal/physical/emotional abuse; OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.68, 2.54), and bullying (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.73, 2.62) histories. SGMs had higher global EDE-Q scores than CHs at admission (γ = 0.42, SE = 0.08, p < .001) but improved faster early in treatment (γ = 0.316, SE = 0.12, p = .008). By discharge, EDE-Q scores did not differ between SGMs and CHs.
Our main hypothesis of greater abuse histories among SGMs was supported and could be one explanation of their more severe ED symptoms at treatment admission compared to CHs. In addition, elevated symptom severity in SGMs at admission coincides with greater delay between ED onset and treatment initiation among SGMs-possibly a consequence of difficulties with ED recognition in SGMs by healthcare providers. We recommend increased training for providers on identifying EDs in SGMs to reduce barriers to early intervention.
性/性别少数群体(SGM)中饮食失调(ED)的发病率更高。我们目前对进入 ED 专科护理的 SGM 的风险因素特征知之甚少。
(a)在进入治疗时,比较 SGM 与顺性别异性恋者(CH)的与虐待相关的风险史,(b)确定 SGM 是否比 CH 进入和退出治疗时具有更严重的 ED 症状,以及(c)确定 SGM 在治疗期间 ED 症状的改善率是否与 CH 不同。
我们分析了一家大型美国 ED 中心 2818 名患者的数据,其中 471 名(17%)患者为 SGM。使用逻辑回归测试目标 1,使用混合效应模型测试目标 2 和 3。
SGM 发生性虐待(OR = 2.10,95%CI = 1.71,2.58)、其他创伤(例如言语/身体/情感虐待;OR = 2.07,95%CI = 1.68,2.54)和欺凌(OR = 2.13,95%CI = 1.73,2.62)的发生率更高。SGM 入院时的全球 EDE-Q 评分高于 CH(γ=0.42,SE=0.08,p<.001),但在治疗早期改善更快(γ=0.316,SE=0.12,p=0.008)。出院时,SGM 和 CH 的 EDE-Q 评分无差异。
我们的主要假设是 SGM 中有更多的虐待史,这可以解释为什么他们在治疗入院时的 ED 症状比 CH 更严重。此外,SGM 入院时的症状严重程度升高与 SGM 从 ED 发病到开始治疗的时间延迟有关-可能是医疗保健提供者对 SGM 中 ED 的识别存在困难的结果。我们建议增加对提供者的培训,以识别 SGM 中的 ED,以减少早期干预的障碍。