• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项最长达 7 天的胰岛素输注套件使用的前瞻性研究:早期更换的原因及其对血糖控制的影响。

A Prospective Study of Insulin Infusion Set Use for up to 7 Days: Early Replacement Reasons and Impact on Glycemic Control.

机构信息

Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Ypsomed AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Oct;22(10):734-741. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0445. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2019.0445
PMID:32167382
Abstract

There is limited evidence supporting a replacement interval of infusion sets for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The aim of this study was to investigate if steel and soft cannula infusion sets can be used in CSII therapy for up to 7 days without negative impact on infusion sites or glycemic control. The insulin infusion sets YpsoPump Orbitmicro (steel needle) and YpsoPump Orbitsoft (soft cannula) were each used for up to 7 days by 40 adult subjects with CSII. Each subject used both infusion set types twice. Early replacement reasons were documented and glycemic control was monitored. Of 160 inserted insulin infusion sets, 66% were used for 7 days with no obvious difference between steel and soft infusion sets. The mean wearing time was 6.2 ± 1.5 days. Main reasons for early infusion set replacements were occlusions (19%), plaster issues (4%), and accidental pull-out (4%). Comparing glycemic control during day 1-3 and 1-7, mean glucose was 146 ± 21 mg/dL versus 148 ± 18 mg/dL, coefficient of variation was 34% ± 7% versus 33% ± 5%, and insulin dose was 40 ± 11 U versus 41 ± 11 U. Only mild and nonserious infusion site reactions occurred. In this study, 7 days indwelling time of insulin infusion sets did not show a clinically relevant impact on glycemic control or insulin requirements and the infectious risk appeared to be low. The replacement interval of infusion sets may be individualized beyond the currently labeled maximum use duration.

摘要

目前仅有有限的证据支持连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的输注套件更换间隔。本研究旨在探讨钢针和软套管输注套件是否可在 CSII 治疗中使用长达 7 天而不会对输注部位或血糖控制产生负面影响。40 名接受 CSII 治疗的成年患者分别使用 YpsoPump Orbitmicro(钢针)和 YpsoPump Orbitsoft(软套管)胰岛素输注套件长达 7 天。每位患者两种输注套件各使用两次。记录早期更换的原因并监测血糖控制情况。在 160 个插入的胰岛素输注套件中,66%的套件使用了 7 天,钢针和软套管输注套件之间没有明显差异。平均佩戴时间为 6.2±1.5 天。早期更换输注套件的主要原因是堵塞(19%)、石膏问题(4%)和意外拔出(4%)。比较第 1-3 天和第 1-7 天的血糖控制情况,平均血糖分别为 146±21mg/dL 和 148±18mg/dL,变异系数分别为 34%±7%和 33%±5%,胰岛素剂量分别为 40±11U 和 41±11U。仅发生轻度且非严重的输注部位反应。在这项研究中,胰岛素输注套件留置 7 天不会对血糖控制或胰岛素需求产生明显的临床相关影响,感染风险似乎较低。输注套件的更换间隔时间可能会超过目前规定的最长使用时间而个体化。

相似文献

1
A Prospective Study of Insulin Infusion Set Use for up to 7 Days: Early Replacement Reasons and Impact on Glycemic Control.一项最长达 7 天的胰岛素输注套件使用的前瞻性研究:早期更换的原因及其对血糖控制的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Oct;22(10):734-741. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0445. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple dose of insulin regimen display similar patterns of blood glucose excursions in pediatric type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注和多次胰岛素注射方案在儿童1型糖尿病中显示出相似的血糖波动模式。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Aug;7(4):587-96. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.587.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion attenuated glycemic instability in preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.持续皮下胰岛素输注可减轻1型糖尿病学龄前儿童的血糖不稳定。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Aug;9(4):339-47. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.0038.
4
Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment: a randomized study. The Study Group for the Development of Pump Therapy in Diabetes.在强化治疗的1型糖尿病患者中使用赖脯胰岛素比较持续皮下胰岛素输注和每日多次注射方案:一项随机研究。糖尿病泵治疗发展研究组。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1232-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1232.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Continuous Insulin Infusion in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Turkey.土耳其 1 型糖尿病患者使用传感器增强型胰岛素泵治疗与持续胰岛素输注的成本效益比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Dec;21(12):727-735. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0198. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
Glucose Variability and Time in Range in Type 2 Diabetes Treated with U-500R by Pump or Injection: CGM Findings from the VIVID Study.U-500R 泵或注射治疗 2 型糖尿病的血糖变异性和时间范围:来自 VIVID 研究的 CGM 结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Jan;23(1):51-58. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0030. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
ProAct study: new features of insulin pumps improve diabetes management and glycemic control in patients after transition of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion systems.ProAct 研究:胰岛素泵的新特性改善了接受连续皮下胰岛素输注系统转换后的患者的糖尿病管理和血糖控制。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Sep;15(9):738-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0090. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
8
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion does not correspond with pregnancy outcomes despite better glycemic control as compared to multiple daily injections in type 1 diabetes - Significance of pregnancy planning and prepregnancy HbA1c.与1型糖尿病多次皮下注射相比,持续皮下胰岛素输注尽管能更好地控制血糖,但与妊娠结局并无关联——妊娠计划和孕前糖化血红蛋白的意义。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;172:108628. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108628. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
Insulin requirement profiles and related factors of insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵治疗的胰岛素需求特征及相关因素。
Sci China Life Sci. 2019 Nov;62(11):1506-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9530-3. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Improved glycemic control with use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with multiple insulin injection therapy.与多次胰岛素注射治疗相比,使用持续皮下胰岛素输注改善血糖控制。
Endocr Pract. 2000 Sep-Oct;6(5):357-60. doi: 10.4158/EP.6.5.357.

引用本文的文献

1
Observational Study of the Impact of Infusion Set Replacement in Insulin Pump Users on Glycemic Management.胰岛素泵使用者更换输液装置对血糖管理影响的观察性研究
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 28:19322968251345837. doi: 10.1177/19322968251345837.
2
Does the Type of Cannula Matter? A Case Report and Review of the Evidence Regarding Steel and Plastic Cannulae With Respect to a Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion.套管类型重要吗?一例病例报告及关于用于持续皮下胰岛素输注的钢质和塑料套管的证据综述。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 18;16(11):e73900. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73900. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Insulin Delivery Hardware: Pumps and Pens.
胰岛素给药器械:泵和笔
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(S1):S30-S43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.2503.
4
Advances in Insulin Infusion Set in the New Era of Automated Insulin Delivery: A Systematic Review.新时代自动化胰岛素输注中胰岛素输注套件的进展:系统评价。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):302-313. doi: 10.1177/19322968221145731. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Impact of Infusion Set Materials and Designs on the Subcutaneous Response in People With Diabetes: A Rapid Review of the Literature.输注套件材料和设计对糖尿病患者皮下反应的影响:文献快速回顾。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):314-321. doi: 10.1177/19322968221138076. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Progressive Acceleration of Insulin Exposure Over 7 Days of Infusion Set Wear.胰岛素输注 7 天内的渐进性加速暴露。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):143-147. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0323. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Development of the Extended Infusion Set and Its Mechanism of Action.扩展输注套件的开发及其作用机制。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Mar;18(2):454-459. doi: 10.1177/19322968221112120. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
In Vivo Study of the Inflammatory Tissue Response Surrounding a Novel Extended-Wear Kink-Resistant Insulin Infusion Set Prototype Compared With a Commercial Control Over Two Weeks of Wear Time.新型延长佩戴、抗扭结胰岛素输注套件与商用对照在两周佩戴时间内的炎症组织反应的体内研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1563-1572. doi: 10.1177/19322968221093362. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
Evaluation of Extended Infusion Set Performance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Infusion Set Survival Rate and Glycemic Outcomes from a Pivotal Trial.评估 1 型糖尿病成人中延长输注套件的性能:一项关键性试验中的输注套件存活率和血糖结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Aug;24(8):535-543. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0540. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Improving the Patient Experience With Longer Wear Infusion Sets Symposium Report.改善患者对长效输注套件的体验研讨会报告。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):775-782. doi: 10.1177/19322968221078884. Epub 2022 Feb 28.