Rainier Clinical Research Center, Renton, Washington, USA.
Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Aug;24(8):535-543. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0540. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Standard insulin infusion sets (IISs) are to be replaced every 2 to 3 days to avoid complications and diabetic ketosis due to set failure. This pivotal trial evaluated the safety and performance of a new extended-wear infusion set (EIS) when used for 7 days by adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This single-arm, nonrandomized trial enrolled adults (18-80 years of age) with T1D, who used their own MiniMed™ 670G system with insulin lispro or insulin aspart and the EIS for up to 7 days, across 12 consecutive wears. Safety endpoints included incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs), severe hypoglycemia (SevHypo), severe hyperglycemia (SevHyper), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and skin infection. The EIS failure rate due to unexplained hyperglycemia (i.e., suspected occlusion), the overall EIS survival rate, glycemic control outcomes (i.e., A1C, mean sensor glucose and time spent in established glucose ranges), total daily insulin delivered, and satisfaction with the EIS were determined. The intention to treat population ( = 259, 48% men, 45.0 ± 14.1 years) wore a total of 3041 EIS devices. No SADE, UADE, or DKA events was reported. Overall rates of SAEs, SevHypo, SevHyper, and skin infection were 3.8, 2.5, 104.1, and 20.1 events per 100 participant-years. The rate of EIS failure due to unexplained hyperglycemia at the end of day 7 was 0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.51) and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.16-1.00) for insulin lispro and aspart use, respectively. Overall EIS survival rate at the end of day 7 was 77.8% (95% CI: 76.2-79.3), glycemic control did not change, and participants reported greater satisfaction with the EIS compared with standard IISs worn before the study ( < 0.001). This investigation demonstrates that the EIS, when worn for up to 7 days, was safe and rated with high satisfaction, without adversely affecting glycemic control in adults with T1D. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04113694 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04113694).
标准胰岛素输注套件(IIS)应每 2 至 3 天更换一次,以避免因套件故障导致的并发症和糖尿病酮症酸中毒。这项关键性试验评估了一种新型延长佩戴输注套件(EIS)在 12 名连续佩戴 7 天期间在 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者中的安全性和性能。这项单臂、非随机试验纳入了使用自身 MiniMed™ 670G 系统输注赖脯胰岛素或门冬胰岛素的 18-80 岁 T1D 成人患者,最长佩戴时间为 7 天,共佩戴了 12 次。安全性终点包括严重不良事件(SAE)、严重不良设备事件(SADE)、意外不良设备事件(UADE)、严重低血糖(SevHypo)、严重高血糖(SevHyper)、糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)和皮肤感染的发生率。由于不明原因的高血糖(即疑似阻塞)导致的 EIS 故障率、整体 EIS 存活率、血糖控制结果(即 A1C、平均传感器血糖和既定血糖范围内的时间)、每日总胰岛素输送量以及对 EIS 的满意度。意向治疗人群( = 259 名,48%为男性,45.0 ± 14.1 岁)总共佩戴了 3041 个 EIS 装置。未报告 SADE、UADE 或 DKA 事件。SAE、SevHypo、SevHyper 和皮肤感染的总发生率分别为每 100 名参与者年 3.8、2.5、104.1 和 20.1 例。第 7 天结束时,由于不明原因的高血糖导致 EIS 故障的发生率分别为赖脯胰岛素和门冬胰岛素使用时的 0.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.03-0.51)和 0.4%(95%CI:0.16-1.00)。第 7 天结束时,EIS 的总体存活率为 77.8%(95%CI:76.2-79.3),血糖控制未发生变化,与研究前佩戴的标准 IIS 相比,参与者报告对 EIS 的满意度更高( < 0.001)。这项研究表明,在 1 型糖尿病成人患者中,EIS 最长佩戴 7 天是安全的,且患者满意度高,不会对血糖控制产生不利影响。临床试验注册号:NCT04113694(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04113694)。