Kobayashi Masatake, Stienen Susan, Ter Maaten Jozine M, Dickstein Kenneth, Samani Nilesh J, Lang Chim C, Ng Leong L, Anker Stefan D, Metra Macro, Preud'homme Gregoire, Duarte Kevin, Lamiral Zohra, Girerd Nicolas, Rossignol Patrick, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Voors Adriaan A, Zannad Faiez, Ferreira João Pedro
INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, Inserm U1116, CHRU de Nancy and F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):953-963. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12634. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and has been associated with poor prognosis. There are limited data on the associations of renin and aldosterone levels with clinical profiles, treatment response, and study outcomes in patients with HF.
We analysed 2,039 patients with available baseline renin and aldosterone levels in BIOSTAT-CHF (a systems BIOlogy study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure). The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization. We also investigated changes in renin and aldosterone levels after administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in a subset of the EPHESUS trial and in an acute HF cohort (PORTO). In BIOSTAT-CHF study, median renin and aldosterone levels were 85.3 (percentile = 28-247) μIU/mL and 9.4 (percentile = 4.4-19.8) ng/dL, respectively. Prior HF admission, lower blood pressure, sodium, poorer renal function, and MRA treatment were associated with higher renin and aldosterone. Higher renin was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome [highest vs. lowest renin tertile: adjusted-HR (95% CI) = 1.47 (1.16-1.86), P = 0.002], whereas higher aldosterone was not [highest vs. lowest aldosterone tertile: adjusted-HR (95% CI) = 1.16 (0.93-1.44), P = 0.19]. Renin and/or aldosterone did not improve the BIOSTAT-CHF prognostic models. The rise in aldosterone with the use of MRAs was observed in EPHESUS and PORTO studies.
Circulating levels of renin and aldosterone were associated with both the disease severity and use of MRAs. By reflecting both the disease and its treatments, the prognostic discrimination of these biomarkers was poor. Our data suggest that the "point" measurement of renin and aldosterone in HF is of limited clinical utility.
肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统的激活在心力衰竭(HF)的病理生理学中起重要作用,并且与不良预后相关。关于HF患者肾素和醛固酮水平与临床特征、治疗反应及研究结局之间关联的数据有限。
我们分析了BIOSTAT - CHF(一项慢性心力衰竭个体化治疗的系统生物学研究)中2039例有可用基线肾素和醛固酮水平的患者。主要结局是全因死亡率或HF住院的复合终点。我们还在依普利酮试验的一个亚组和急性HF队列(PORTO)中研究了给予盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)后肾素和醛固酮水平的变化。在BIOSTAT - CHF研究中,肾素和醛固酮水平的中位数分别为85.3(百分位数=28 - 247)μIU/mL和9.4(百分位数=4.4 - 19.8)ng/dL。既往HF住院、较低的血压、血钠、较差的肾功能以及MRA治疗与较高的肾素和醛固酮水平相关。较高的肾素与主要结局发生率增加相关[肾素三分位数最高组与最低组:校正后风险比(95%置信区间)=1.47(1.16 - 1.86),P = 0.002],而较高的醛固酮则不然[醛固酮三分位数最高组与最低组:校正后风险比(95%置信区间)=1.16(0.93 - 1.44),P = 0.19]。肾素和/或醛固酮并未改善BIOSTAT - CHF预后模型。在依普利酮试验和PORTO研究中观察到使用MRA后醛固酮升高。
肾素和醛固酮的循环水平与疾病严重程度和MRA的使用均相关。由于这些生物标志物既反映疾病又反映其治疗情况,其预后判别能力较差。我们的数据表明,HF中肾素和醛固酮的“点”测量临床应用价值有限。