Suppr超能文献

产品成分标签准确性:比较药店产品与在线数据库和在线零售商。

Accuracy of Product Ingredient Labeling: Comparing Drugstore Products With Online Databases and Online Retailers.

机构信息

From the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):106-111. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000553.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with allergic contact dermatitis rely on ingredient lists published in databases and by online retailers to find safe skincare products.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of product ingredient labeling by comparing drugstore product labels to ingredient lists published online.

METHODS

Amazon was queried for best-selling items in several categories of skincare, generating a list of 93 products. These products were then found at a local Target and Walgreens and online on Contact Allergen Management Program, SkinSAFE, and Consumer Product Information Database. Drugstore product labels were compared with online ingredient lists and analyzed for discrepancies.

RESULTS

There were 31 occurrences in which an allergen listed in the 2017 American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series was omitted (present on the in-store label but missing from an online list.) Seven omissions occurred on Contact Allergen Management Program, 11 occurred on SkinSAFE, 5 occurred on Consumer Product Information Database, and 8 occurred on Amazon.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive treatment of allergic contact dermatitis is avoidance of allergens found on patch testing. These data suggest that patients may be at risk of inadvertent exposure to allergens from products, which are supposedly deemed safe according to online ingredient lists.

摘要

背景

患有过敏性接触性皮炎的患者依赖数据库和在线零售商发布的成分清单来寻找安全的护肤品。

目的

本研究旨在通过比较药店产品标签与在线发布的成分清单,确定产品成分标签的准确性。

方法

在亚马逊上查询了几个护肤品类别的畅销产品,生成了一份 93 种产品的清单。然后在当地的 Target 和 Walgreens 以及 Contact Allergen Management Program、SkinSAFE 和 Consumer Product Information Database 等网站上寻找这些产品。将药店产品标签与在线成分清单进行比较,并分析差异。

结果

在 2017 年美国接触性皮炎学会核心过敏原系列中列出的过敏原有 31 种被遗漏(店内标签上有,但在线清单上没有)。7 种遗漏发生在 Contact Allergen Management Program 上,11 种遗漏发生在 SkinSAFE 上,5 种遗漏发生在 Consumer Product Information Database 上,8 种遗漏发生在亚马逊上。

结论

过敏性接触性皮炎的明确治疗方法是避免接触斑贴试验中发现的过敏原。这些数据表明,根据在线成分清单,患者可能有接触产品中过敏原的风险,而这些产品据称是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验