Department of Biology, Science Centre, Federal University of Ceará-UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230097. eCollection 2020.
The relative importance of different community assembly mechanisms varies depending on the environment. According to the stress-dominance hypothesis (SDH), assembly mechanisms range from strong abiotic filtering to competition as the environment becomes more favourable. Most evidence for the SDH comes from studies in gradients of conditions (i.e. abiotic environmental factors that influence the functioning of organisms but are not consumed by them). However, we hypothesized that in resource gradients, competition increases as abiotic filtering becomes stronger. To test our hypothesis, we set up eight plots at different sites along an abiotic severity gradient in the Brazilian semi-arid region (BSAR). In each plot, we identified and measured each woody plant species found, and we recorded 11 functional traits of the main species, dividing the traits into alpha (competition effects) and beta (abiotic filtering effects). We investigated the presence of phylogenetic signal in the traits, the community phylogenetic and phenotypic patterns, and associated the variation in these patterns with the availability of water and soil nutrients. We found phylogenetic signal for most (91%) of the traits analysed. The phylogenetic patterns varied from clustered in stressful sites to random or overdispersed in favourable sites, and we concluded that these phylogenetic patterns were the result of historical processes influencing community assembly in different environments in the BSAR. In general, the phenotypic patterns varied from clustered at the most stressful end to random at less stressful sites. Our results show that in resource gradients, any restriction of the resource (hydric or edaphic) intensifies abiotic filtering and, at the same time, increases the competitive hierarchy among species. On the other hand, stochastic processes seem to have a stronger influence under more favourable abiotic conditions, where abiotic filtering and competition are weaker. Thus, we conclude that the SDH is not supported in resource gradients.
不同的群落组装机制的相对重要性因环境而异。根据胁迫主导假说(SDH),随着环境变得更加有利,组装机制从强烈的非生物过滤到竞争不等。SDH 的大多数证据来自于条件梯度(即影响生物功能但不被生物消耗的非生物环境因素)的研究。然而,我们假设在资源梯度中,随着非生物过滤的增强,竞争会增加。为了检验我们的假设,我们在巴西半干旱地区(BSAR)的非生物严重程度梯度的不同地点设置了 8 个样地。在每个样地中,我们识别并测量了每个木本植物物种,并记录了主要物种的 11 个功能特征,将特征分为 alpha(竞争效应)和 beta(非生物过滤效应)。我们调查了特征中是否存在系统发育信号,群落系统发育和表型模式,并将这些模式的变化与水和土壤养分的可利用性联系起来。我们发现大多数(91%)分析的特征具有系统发育信号。系统发育模式从在紧张的地方聚集到在有利的地方随机或过度分散,我们得出结论,这些系统发育模式是历史过程在 BSAR 的不同环境中影响群落组装的结果。一般来说,表型模式从最紧张的一端聚集到较不紧张的一端随机。我们的研究结果表明,在资源梯度中,任何对资源(水或土壤)的限制都会加剧非生物过滤,同时增加物种之间的竞争层次。另一方面,随机过程似乎在更有利的非生物条件下具有更强的影响,在这些条件下,非生物过滤和竞争较弱。因此,我们得出结论,资源梯度中不支持 SDH。