Division of Pharmacognosy, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
National Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Planta Med. 2020 May;86(7):470-481. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-3711. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Overlapping geographical occurrence, history of traditional use, confusion in species identification, and morphological resemblances among various species are some considerations that necessitate the importance of qualitative analysis for efficient quality control and safer botanical products. This paper provides detailed morpho-anatomies of the leaves and stems of , and , and stems of . Microscopy studies of the selected species revealed key diagnostic features that can help distinguish the closely related species of as well as to detect any adulteration or substitution in the raw materials. HPTLC profiles of the authenticated plant materials, as well as commercial products claiming to contain , were compared to distinguish from other closely related species and to establish an efficient method to assess the identity and quality of the products using qualified chemical markers. HPTLC chromatograms of both plant samples and dietary supplements were compared with six reference marker compounds. The analysis revealed that borapetoside B and C were useful to identify while tinosineside A was found to be characteristic to authenticate the products.
地理分布重叠、传统应用历史、物种鉴定混淆以及不同物种之间的形态相似性等因素,都需要进行定性分析,以实现有效的质量控制和更安全的植物产品。本文详细描述了 和 的叶片和茎部,以及 的茎部的形态解剖结构。对所选 物种的显微镜研究揭示了关键的诊断特征,有助于区分密切相关的 物种,并检测原材料中的任何掺假或替代物。经过鉴定的植物材料以及声称含有 的商业产品的 HPTLC 图谱进行了比较,以区分 与其他密切相关的物种,并建立一种使用合格化学标志物评估产品身份和质量的有效方法。对植物样品和膳食补充剂的 HPTLC 图谱与六种参考标记化合物进行了比较。分析表明,borapetoside B 和 C 可用于鉴定 ,而 tinosineside A 则被发现是鉴定 产品的特征性化合物。