• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲医生对长效注射用抗精神病药物使用的态度。

Attitudes of European physicians towards the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.

机构信息

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Lundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02530-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02530-2
PMID:32169077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prescription rates for long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations remain relatively low in Europe despite improved adherence over alternative oral antipsychotic treatments. This apparent under-prescription of LAI antipsychotics may have multiple contributing factors, including negative mental health practitioner attitudes towards the use of LAIs.

METHODS

The Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) non-interventional study (NIS), conducted across several European countries, utilised a questionnaire that was specifically designed to address physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards the treatment of schizophrenia with LAI antipsychotics. Exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) of feedback from the questionnaire aimed to identify and characterize the factors that best explained the physicians' attitudes towards prescription of LAIs.

RESULTS

Overall, 136/234 solicited physicians returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians' mean age was 48.5 years, with mean psychiatric experience of 20.0 years; 69.9% were male, 84.6% held a consultant position, and 91.9% had a clinical specialty in general adult care. Most physicians considered themselves to have a high level of clinical experience with LAI antipsychotics (77.2%), with an increased rate of LAI antipsychotics prescription over the last 5 years (59.6%). Although the majority of physicians (69.9%) declared feeling no difference in stress levels when offering LAI compared to oral antipsychotics, feelings of 'no/more stress' versus 'less stress' was found to influence prescription patterns. PCA identified six factors which collectively explained 66.1% of the variance in physician feedback. Multivariate analysis identified a positive correlation between physicians willing to accept usage of LAI antipsychotics and the positive attitude of colleagues (co-efficient 3.67; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The physician questionnaire in the ALTO study is the first to evaluate the attitudes around LAI antipsychotics across several European countries, on a larger scale. Findings from this study offer an important insight into how physician attitudes can influence the acceptance and usage of LAI antipsychotics to treat patients with schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

尽管长效注射型(LAI)抗精神病药物在改善依从性方面优于其他口服抗精神病药物,但在欧洲,此类药物的处方率仍然相对较低。这种 LAI 抗精神病药物的明显处方不足可能有多个促成因素,包括心理健康从业者对使用 LAI 的负面态度。

方法

在几个欧洲国家进行的抗精神病长效注射治疗精神分裂症(ALTO)非干预性研究(NIS)使用了专门设计的问卷,以解决医生对 LAI 抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的态度和信念。对问卷反馈进行探索性主成分分析(PCA),旨在确定并描述最能解释医生处方 LAI 态度的因素。

结果

共有 234 名受邀医生中的 136 人返回了完整填写的问卷。医生的平均年龄为 48.5 岁,平均精神科经验为 20.0 年;69.9%为男性,84.6%为顾问职位,91.9%有普通成人护理的临床专业。大多数医生认为自己在 LAI 抗精神病药物方面有较高的临床经验(77.2%),过去 5 年 LAI 抗精神病药物的处方率增加(59.6%)。尽管大多数医生(69.9%)表示在提供 LAI 与口服抗精神病药物相比时,他们的压力水平没有差异,但发现“无/更少压力”与“更少压力”的感觉会影响处方模式。PCA 确定了六个因素,这些因素共同解释了医生反馈中 66.1%的方差。多变量分析表明,医生愿意接受 LAI 抗精神病药物的使用与同事的积极态度之间存在正相关(系数为 3.67;p=0.016)。

结论

ALTO 研究中的医生问卷是第一个在多个欧洲国家评估围绕 LAI 抗精神病药物的态度的研究,规模更大。该研究的结果提供了一个重要的视角,了解医生的态度如何影响 LAI 抗精神病药物的接受和使用,以治疗精神分裂症患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bd/7071632/35d57f8b7a1d/12888_2020_2530_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bd/7071632/97d7ec794b5e/12888_2020_2530_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bd/7071632/35d57f8b7a1d/12888_2020_2530_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bd/7071632/97d7ec794b5e/12888_2020_2530_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bd/7071632/35d57f8b7a1d/12888_2020_2530_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudes of European physicians towards the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.欧洲医生对长效注射用抗精神病药物使用的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02530-2.
2
Baseline results from the European non-interventional Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study.欧洲非干预性抗精神病长效注射治疗精神分裂症(ALTO)研究的基线结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;52:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Attitudes towards the administration of long-acting antipsychotics: a survey of physicians and nurses.长效抗精神病药物给药态度:对医生和护士的调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 17;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-58.
4
A qualitative study of experiences with and perceptions regarding long-acting injectable antipsychotics: part II-physician perspectives.一项关于长效注射抗精神病药的体验和认知的定性研究:第二部分——医生观点。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 May;58(5 Suppl 1):23S-9S. doi: 10.1177/088740341305805s04.
5
Effects of oral versus long-acting antipsychotics on social functioning: A psychiatrists' survey in India.口服抗精神病药与长效抗精神病药对社会功能的影响:印度精神科医生的调查。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Dec;30:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Spending in Medicaid Beneficiaries Initiating Second-generation Long-acting Injectable Agents Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.启动第二代长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及支出情况
Clin Ther. 2017 Oct;39(10):1972-1985.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Attitude and influencing factors of patients with schizophrenia toward long-acting injections: A community-based cross-sectional investigation in China.精神分裂症患者对长效注射治疗的态度及其影响因素:基于社区的横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:951544. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.951544. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient and prescriber perspectives on long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics and analysis of in-office discussion regarding LAI treatment for schizophrenia.患者及处方者对长效注射用抗精神病药物的看法以及关于精神分裂症长效注射治疗的门诊讨论分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 16;13:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-261.
9
Guidelines for the use and management of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in serious mental illness.严重精神疾病中长效注射用抗精神病药物的使用与管理指南
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 20;13:340. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-340.
10
Perceptions of Psychiatrists Toward the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: An Online Survey Study From India.印度在线调查研究:精神科医生对使用长效注射抗精神病药的看法。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Nov/Dec;39(6):611-619. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001109.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Selecting and Initiating Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia: Results From the US DECIDE Survey.选择并开始使用长效注射用抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症患者的偏好:美国DECIDE调查结果
Schizophr Bull Open. 2025 Jan 8;6(1):sgaf001. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf001. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Predictors of Readmission in Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Multicentric Retrospective Study with a 12-Month Follow-Up.首发精神病青年成人再入院的预测因素:一项为期12个月随访的多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 24;14(4):1234-1244. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040099.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Focused Ethnographic Examination of Barriers to Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.聚焦于使用长效注射用抗精神病药物障碍的人种学研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Apr 1;71(4):337-342. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900236. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
Patients With Early-Phase Schizophrenia Will Accept Treatment With Sustained-Release Medication (Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics): Results From the Recruitment Phase of the PRELAPSE Trial.早期精神分裂症患者将接受长效抗精神病药物(长效注射剂)的治疗:PRELAPSE 试验招募阶段的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 23;80(3):18m12546. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12546.
3
Baseline results from the European non-interventional Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study.
Barriers to long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic use in Japan: Insights from a comparative psychiatrist survey.
日本长效非典型抗精神病药使用障碍:来自比较精神科医生调查的见解。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Jun;44(2):417-423. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12435. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Comparative Safety of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.长效注射用抗精神病药物的比较安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Dec;20(12):1112-1125. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0216. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
Patient and Healthcare Professional Preferences for Characteristics of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.患者和医疗保健专业人员对长效注射抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的特征的偏好。
Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2249-2264. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02455-8. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Achieving long-term goals through early personalized management of schizophrenia: expert opinion on the role of a new fast-onset long-acting injectable antipsychotic.通过早期个性化管理精神分裂症实现长期目标:关于新型快速起效长效注射用抗精神病药物作用的专家意见
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 17;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12991-022-00430-1.
7
Attitude and influencing factors of patients with schizophrenia toward long-acting injections: A community-based cross-sectional investigation in China.精神分裂症患者对长效注射治疗的态度及其影响因素:基于社区的横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:951544. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.951544. eCollection 2022.
8
Attitudes and perceptions about the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics among behavioral health practitioners.行为健康从业者对长效注射用抗精神病药物使用的态度和看法。
Ment Health Clin. 2022 Aug 23;12(4):232-240. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2022.08.232. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder in an Academic Psychiatric Hospital in Switzerland.瑞士一家学术性精神病医院中长效注射用抗精神病药物在精神分裂症谱系障碍住院患者中的应用
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):441. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030441.
10
One-Month versus Three-Month Formulation of Paliperidone Palmitate Treatment in Psychotic Disorders: Patients', Relatives', and Mental Health Professionals' Perspectives.帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯治疗精神障碍的1个月与3个月剂型:患者、亲属及精神卫生专业人员的观点
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Mar 4;16:615-624. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S349460. eCollection 2022.
欧洲非干预性抗精神病长效注射治疗精神分裂症(ALTO)研究的基线结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;52:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia.29823例精神分裂症患者全国队列中抗精神病药物治疗的真实世界有效性
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):686-693. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1322.
5
Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation in patients with schizophrenia: A phase-1, single-dose, randomized, open-label study.帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯3个月剂型在精神分裂症患者中的药代动力学、安全性及耐受性:一项1期单剂量随机开放标签研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;56(3):330-9. doi: 10.1002/jcph.597. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
6
Effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics: a clinical perspective.长效注射用抗精神病药物的有效性:临床视角
Evid Based Ment Health. 2015 May;18(2):36-9. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102086. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
The role of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a critical appraisal.长效注射用抗精神病药在精神分裂症中的作用:批判性评价。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;4(5):198-219. doi: 10.1177/2045125314540297.
8
Quality of prescribing for schizophrenia: evidence from a national audit in England and Wales.精神分裂症处方质量:来自英格兰和威尔士全国性审计的证据。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;24(4):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
9
Patient and prescriber perspectives on long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics and analysis of in-office discussion regarding LAI treatment for schizophrenia.患者及处方者对长效注射用抗精神病药物的看法以及关于精神分裂症长效注射治疗的门诊讨论分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 16;13:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-261.
10
Efficacy and effectiveness of depot versus oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia: synthesizing results across different research designs.长效与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的疗效和效果:综合不同研究设计的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):568-75. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r08167. Epub 2013 Apr 19.